Appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on Indigenous Peoples (APPA) - Bill C - 45, An Act to amend the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, to make consequential amendments to other Acts, and to make a clarification relating to another Act (June 6, 2023)

Table of contents

Scenario Note

The Standing Senate Committee on Indigenous Peoples (APPA) will be meeting on June 6 at 9:00 a.m., 2023 to study Bill C - 45. Minister Marc Miller will be appearing in person. An overview of this process is outlined below.

Logistics

Subject: Bill C – 45, An Act to amend the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, to make consequential amendments to other Acts, and to make a clarification relating to another Act

Date: June 6, 2023

Time: 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.

Location
Senate of Canada Building (Room C128)
2 Rideau Street is one block away from Parliament Hill
between the Château Laurier and the National Arts Centre.

Witnesses

(9:00 a.m. – 9:45 a.m.):

  • Honourable Marc Miller, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations

Department officials:

(9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.):

Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs
  • Christopher Duschenes, Director General, Indigenous Institutions and Governance Modernization
  • Philippe Bertrand, Manager, Fiscal Policy and Investment Readiness
  • Andrea Dixon, Senior Policy Officer, Fiscal Policy and Investment Readiness
  • Karine Tremblay, Senior Policy Analyst, Fiscal Policy and Investment Readiness
Department of Justice
  • Andrew Ouchterlony, Legal Counsel, Department of Justice
Department of Indigenous Services Canada
  • Joanne Wilkinson, Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Regional Operations Sector
  • Jessica Sultan, Director General, Economic Policy Development
  • Lynne Newman, Director General, Fiscal Arrangements

Committee Members (APPA):

  • Chair Brian Francis (PSG - Prince Edward Island)
  • Deputy Chair David M. Arnot (ISG - Saskatchewan)
  • Senator Michèle Audette (PSG - Québec)
  • Senator Mary Coyle (ISG - Nova Scotia)
  • Senator Margo Greenwood (ISG - British Columbia)
  • Senator Nancy J. Harling (ISG – New Brunswick)
  • Senator Patti La Boucane-Benson (Non-affiliated - Alberta)
  • Senator Yonah Martin (C - British Columbia)
  • Senator Dennis Glen Patterson (CSG - Nunavut)
  • Senator Donald Neil Plett (C - Manitoba)
  • Senator Karen Sorensen (ISG - Alberta)
  • Senator Scott Tannas (CSG - Alberta)

Planned Agenda

  • The Minister will attend in-person.
  • The Minister's appearance will be from 9:00 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. on June 6, 2023. The Minister will appear for the first forty-five minutes with CIRNAC officials in attendance for the full hour (9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.) to support him and answer questions. ISC officials will also be in attendance for the full hour to respond to questions on ISC matters. The Minister will provide opening remarks of five minutes, and then answer Committee member questions, turning to officials for support if required.
  • The Minister's appearance is scheduled to conclude at 9:45 a.m. or at the call of the Chair.

Meeting Logistics

  • The Minister will be invited to sit at the table by the Chair or the Clerk of the Committee.
  • The Committee Chair, Brian Francis (PSG - Prince Edward Island), will open the meeting and provide instructions for the meeting proceedings. The Chair will then invite the Minister to deliver opening remarks of no more than five minutes.
  • Like other Senate committees, APPA does not follow an order of questioning based on political parties. The Chair decides who to call to ask questions during the meeting.
  • The Chair will usually say how long each member will have for questions and responses just before the start of the time for questions. They usually have about 5 minutes.
  • Quorum is required whenever a vote, resolution or other decision is taken by the committee.  Quorum is defined as 4 committee members, all present in the room regardless of affiliation. 
  • Senators who are not members of the Committee may attend but are not counted as part of quorum.
  • Any Senator may attend committee and question witnesses but only committee members may vote.
  • While Senate committees are generally less partisan than House of Commons Standing Committees, Senators on this Committee tend to ask detailed questions that may result in follow-up requests.

Context

  • With unanimous consent Bill C - 45 was read a third time and passed in the House of Commons on Monday, May 15, 2023.
  • Parliamentary Secretary Jaime Battiste (LPC – Sydney - Victoria) thanked the opposition parties for their support in the House of Commons and at the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs. He noted the co-development and overwhelming support of "First Nations led Institutions" for Bill C - 45.
  • The Leader of the Opposition, Pierre Poilievre (CPC – Carleton), was the last member of his party who spoke in the House of Commons on the bill. He indicated support for C - 45 and wanted the bill to pass as soon as possible. 
  • Lori Idlout (NDP – Nunavut) Critic for Indigenous Services, Northern Affairs and Crown-Indigenous Relations spoke of the NDP support for Bill C - 45. The MP referenced the support of the bill from many First Nations.
  • The Senate sponsor of Bill C - 45 is Senator Marty Klyne (PSG – Saskatchewan) and on May 17, 2023 he received a technical briefing by department officials on the bill.
  • Senator Yonah Martin (British Columbia CPC) Senate Critic, received a technical briefing by departmental officials regarding Bill C - 45 on May, 30, 2023.
  • On May 31, 2023 a technical briefing by departmental officials was held for all Senators on Bill C-45. Also in attendance were representatives and subject matter experts from First Nation's financial institutions.  
  • Second Reading of Bill C - 45 occurred on May 30, 2023 with Senator Klyne and Senator Yonah Martin both speaking. After debate, the motion for second reading was adopted by the Senate.
  • On May 30, 2023, on a motion proposed by Senator Klyne, Bill C - 45 was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Indigenous Peoples (APPA).
  • On May 31, during the study of C-29, National Council for Reconciliation Act, Bill C-45 was mentioned by Senator Patterson and questions were raised on economic reconciliation and how it contributes to healing and wellbeing.
  • Other themes that may arise at this committee appearance include the connection between Bill C-45 and the Framework Agreement on First Nations Land Management, specifically the enforcement provisions, and how ISC and CIRNAC share responsibility between them for land management issues. Given the provisions in Bill C-45 concerning infrastructure, how Indigenous Services Canada provides funding for infrastructure in Indigenous communities may be raised by Senators. In addition, during the briefing with Senator Klyne, questions were raised about monetization and the New Fiscal Relationship Grant (10 year grant), so these may also be raised.

Opening Remarks

Kwe Kwe, Tansi, Hello, Bonjour.

Before I begin, I would like to acknowledge that we're meeting on the unceded traditional territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

Thank you to the committee and the Chair for the invitation to appear to talk about this important legislation to amend the First Nations Fiscal Management Act. We've been engaging with Indigenous partners about it for some time and the main message we hear is "hurry up and get it done."

Mr. Chair, this Act came into force in 2006 and, to date, 348 First Nations have chosen to participate, providing them with a framework to assert their jurisdiction in financial management, taxation, and access to capital markets.

First Nations participating in the Act have better access to capital, more fiscal powers, and better financial management systems. As a result, they're growing their economies and improving socio-economic outcomes (PDF).

Over time, First Nation signatories, and the First Nations-led institutions established by the Act – namely, the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Finance Authority - have identified ways to improve it.

That's what we're talking about today: amendments that have been co-developed with the First Nations institutions to update the Act.

The proposed amendments would expand and modernize the mandates of the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board to better reflect their current and future activities.

They would establish a First Nations Infrastructure Institute that would provide First Nations and other interested Indigenous groups with tools and support to implement and manage their infrastructure.

They would also provide First Nations who are participating in the Act with the power to make laws to regulate services provided by or on behalf of the First Nations.

These amendments are being proposed during an important moment in Canada's process of decolonization. As you know, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act came into force in June 2021, following this committee's thorough study of Bill C-15.

Our government, as a whole, is working with First Nations, Inuit and Métis to implement the United Nations Declaration, and consultations with Indigenous partners have led to the development of a draft action plan. Some action plan measures identified for my department to work on with partners, such as the FNFMA, include amendments to the Fiscal Management Act and implementing the right to self-determination.

The proposed amendments we're talking about today are key to this work.

They would align with the United Nations Declaration, and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Calls to Action, since they support a fiscal relationship that promotes economic development and Indigenous governance through institutional development.

Mr. Chair, before I finish I'd like to provide some examples of how this Act promotes social change with some stories about First Nations in British Columbia.

Neskonlith (Nes-con-lith) First Nation financed a daycare centre that offers Secwepemc (shi-HUEP-mah) cultural activities as its core programming and is open to children of all backgrounds. The circular design is like a winter house – Kekuli -  but it also acknowledges how children are in the middle to nurture, and to be raised in a good way.

'Namgis (NOM-gees) First Nation achieved Financial Management Systems certification in April 2021, which strengthened their governance capacity in key areas. By developing their Financial Administration Law, 'Namgis now has more flexibility in regard to meeting the needs of their community.

Communities are also using financing to build renewable power projects. For example, Sts'ailes (Sh-Hay-Lis) First Nation and Taku River Tlingit (TA-koo River Kling-git) First Nation have constructed run-of-river electricity generation stations. This will help these communities transition to a more sustainable economy.

These are just a few examples and it is clear updating this Act will accelerate social change. The proposed amendments we're discussing are an important part of supporting the self-determination of First Nations communities as they rebuild their nations.

They are about creating an economy that works for everyone. Because in order for Canada to work for everyone, we need an economy that allows prosperity for all.

Meegwetch. Thank you. Merci.

Clause-by-clause analysis

Clause 1

This clause would amend the long title of the Act to include reference to: (i) First Nations powers under the Act beyond real property taxation—i.e. powers to make laws respecting financial administration and services provided on reserve lands; (ii) the new First Nations Infrastructure Institute; and (iii) the pooled borrowing aspect of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act regime.

Clause 2

This clause would make general updates to the Preamble of the Act, and include specific references to: the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action and the Articles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; the Chinook trading language term "taksis"; and "local revenues" in place of "real property taxation" where appropriate.

Clause 3(1)

This clause would repeal the definition of "third-party management" under s. 2(1) of the Act. References to third-party management under the Act would now cross-reference the applicable section numbers: i.e. s. 53 for third-party management of local revenues and s. 53.1 for third-party management of other revenues.

Clause 3(2)

This clause would amend s. 2(1) to include a defined term for the "First Nations Infrastructure Institute," and would mean the institute established under s. 102(1)—see Clause 43 below.

Clause 3(3) 

This clause would integrate the definitions of "intermediate account," "other revenues," and "secured revenues trust account" from the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act. It would also add a new type of revenue to the list of "other revenues" that may be used to secure financing from the First Nations Finance Authority. Revenues from taxes collected by Canada on a First Nation's behalf, including revenues collected under the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act, would be eligible for use should the tax collection agreement specifically permit such a use and any other applicable conditions are satisfied.

Clause 3(4)

In order to facilitate participation in pooled borrowing by borrowing members beyond scheduled First Nations, this clause would amend the scope of the term "borrowing member" for the purposes of ss. 57, 59, 74, 77, 78, 83 and 84 to include an Indigenous group, other than a band named in the schedule, or an organization referred to in paragraph 50.1(1)(e) that has been accepted as a borrowing member under a regulation made under s. 141 or 141.1. This clause would also amend the scope of the term "borrowing member" for the purposes of s. 61 to include an Indigenous group, other than a band named in the schedule, that has been accepted as a borrowing member under a regulation made under s. 141.

Clause 3(5)

This clause would add a new regulation-making power for the Governor in Council to prescribe additional types of revenues under paragraph (k) of the definition "other revenues"—see clause 3(3) above.

Clause 4

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would ensure that First Nations must first make a financial administration law under s. 9(1)(a) and have this law approved by the First Nations Financial Management Board before they can make a borrowing law secured by other revenues law pursuant to s. 8.1(1)(a)—as is currently the case for borrowing laws made under s. 5(1)(d).

Clause 5 (1)

This clause would amend the chapeau of s. 5(1) to remove references to subsections that have been repealed and would clarify the provisions which the law-making power is in fact "subject to."

Clause 5(2)

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would amend s. 5(1)(d) to clarify that laws made under this paragraph are limited to laws respecting borrowing secured by local revenues.

Clause 5(3)

This clause would amend s. 5(1)(e) such that First Nations may make laws respecting the enforcement of laws made under ss. 5(1)(a) and (a.1) more broadly rather than just "in respect of outstanding taxes, charges or fees." 
Clause 5(4)

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would clarify that laws made under s. 5(g) only allow for the delegation of powers to the First Nation Financial Management Board that are required to give effect to  a co-management arrangement or third-party management of a First Nation's local revenues. An equivalent power to delegate would be included under Clause 6 with respect to other revenues.

Clause 5(5)

This clause would expressly empower First Nations to apply to courts of competent jurisdiction for court orders directing persons or entities to comply with a local revenue law. This clause would also expressly allow First Nations to commence proceedings in courts of competent jurisdiction in order to collect amounts owing to the First Nation under a local revenue law. Finally, this clause would enable First Nations with a land code or First Nation law under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management Act to use any enforcement provisions in their land code or law, other than those relating to summary conviction offences, to enforce their local revenue laws.

Clause 6

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act,  this clause would integrate the power for First Nations to make laws respecting the borrowing from the First Nations Finance Authority of money secured by other revenues, as well as ancillary powers of delegation. First Nations would be required to publish laws delegating their law-making and other powers under this section in the First Nations Gazette; the borrowing laws themselves would be published on the First Nations Finance Authority's website pursuant to the new s. 79.1— see Clause 38(2) below.

Clause 7

This clause would amend the chapeau of s. 9(1) in order to clarify which provisions the law-making power is in fact "subject to."

Clauses 8(1) to 8(3)

These clauses would clarify that ss. 11(1) to (3) only apply with respect to borrowing members with an unpaid loan secured by local revenues. These clauses would also replace references to "financing" in s. 11(1)(a) with "loans" in order to ensure consistency throughout the Act.

Clause 9

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would integrate the accounting and reporting requirements for loans secured by other revenues into the Act.

This clause would also amend s. 15 of the Act to reflect the non-application of the provisions of the Indian Act listed therein to borrowing from the First Nations Finance Authority of money that is secured by other revenues—as is the case for borrowing secured by local revenues.

Clause 10

This clause would amend the definition of "taxpayer" to include persons paying fees pursuant to laws made under s. 5(1)(a.1).

Clause 11

This clause would amend s. 20(5) of the Act to replace the gendered expression "men and women" with the gender-neutral term "individuals." The clause would also replace the expression "a system of First Nations real property taxation" with "First Nations local revenue systems."

Clause 12

This clause would make a minor amendment to s. 23(2) to replace the gendered expression "his or her" with the gender-neutral term "their."

Clause 13

This clause would amend s. 29 in order to expand and modernize the mandate of the First Nations Tax Commission. Specific amendments would include:

Clause 14(1)

This clause would simplify the provision by replacing unnecessary text with a cross-reference to the description of financing in s. 74(a).

Clause 14(2)

This clause would amend the Act to clarify the precondition regarding unutilized borrowing capacity that the First Nations Tax Commission evaluates prior to approving a local revenue borrowing law.

Clause 14(3)

This clause would simplify the provision by replacing unnecessary text with a cross-reference to the description of financing in s. 74(a).

Clause 14(4)

This clause would simplify the provision by removing unnecessary text in light of the changes made by Clauses 14(1) and 14(3) above.

Clauses 15(1) to 15(4)

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, these clauses would amend s. 33 of the Act to reflect the fact that s. 33 is only applicable in the local revenues context.

Clause 16

This clause would add a new s. 35.1 that would empower the First Nations Tax Commission to collect, analyze, and publish data for statistical purposes on matters within the scope of its mandate. This clause would also provide protections for identifying information that may be contained within the data collected. Finally, it would provide the Commission with the ability to enter into information sharing agreements.

Clause 17(1)

This clause would add a new s. 41(1.1) that would require the Governor in Council to endeavour to ensure that a majority of the directors of the First Nations Financial Management Board are Indigenous.

Clause 17(2)

This clause would update the qualification for directors of the First Nations Financial Management Board by adding reference to non-scheduled First Nations, tribal councils, and modern treaty and self-governing First Nations. This clause would also replace the gendered expression "men and women" with the gender-neutral term "individuals."

Clause 18

This clause would amend s. 44 of the Act by changing the status of the office of the chairperson of the First Nations Financial Management Board from part-time to full-time. The other directors would continue to hold office on a part-time basis.

Clause 19

Further to Clause 18, this clause would amend s. 45(2) to provide that the Chairperson would be reimbursed for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in performing their duties while absent from their ordinary place of work rather than from their ordinary place of residence.

Clause 20(1)

This clause would broaden the scope of the First Nations Financial Management Board's mandate in ss. 49(a) to (c) to include entities referred to in s. 50.1(1)

Clause 20(2)

This clause would update and expand on the First Nations Financial Management Board's mandate under ss. 49(g) to (i), including by broadening the Board's review and monitoring role, integrating the other revenues context into the Board's potential role in co- and third-party management, and broadening the Board's advisory and research functions. This clause would also expand the Board's mandate to include an ability to collect, analyze, and publish data for statistical purposes within the scope of the Board's mandate. Finally, the mandate would be expanded beyond First Nations to include entities referred to in s. 50.1(1).

Clause 21

This clause would add a new section to the Act so that the First Nations Financial Management Board could provide an optional review and monitoring service to First Nations respecting any aspect of their financial administration for compliance with the Board's standards. Upon completion of its review, the Board would provide the First Nation with a report setting out its findings and its recommendations, if any.

Clauses 22(1) to 22(2)

These clauses would amend Section 50.1 of the English version of the Act to change the term "Aboriginal" to "Indigenous". Clause 22(2) would also amend s. 50.1(1)(e) to include an express reference to "infrastructure" alongside the other "public services" referred to in that paragraph.

Clause 23

This clause would add a new section to the Act so that the First Nations Financial Management Board could provide an optional review and monitoring service to entities referred to in s. 50.1(1) respecting any aspect of their financial administration for compliance with the Board's standards. Upon completion of its review, the Board would provide the entity with a report setting out its findings and its recommendations, if any.

Clause 24

This clause would make several amendments in order to integrate the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations related to intervention by the First Nations Financial Management Board under the Act. Specifically, this clause would clarify that s. 51(1) would apply only in the context of local revenues and would add a new s. 51(2) for required intervention related to other revenues. In both cases, the Board would still retain its discretion to determine whether to impose co-management or third-party management.

Clauses 25(1) to 25(6)

These clauses would make several amendments related to integration into the Act of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations regarding co-management by the First Nations Financial Management Board. Specifically, these clauses would clarify that s. 52 would apply only in the context of imposed co-management by the Board in situations relating to a loan secured by local revenues or to a notice under s. 33(3)(b) or s. 86(4) received by the Board.

Clause 26

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would add a new s. 52.1 to both replicate the provisions of s. 52 of the Act and integrate elements of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations related to co-management by the First Nations Financial Management Board, but provide that this new s. 52.1 would apply only in the context of imposed co-management by the Board in situations relating to a loan secured by other revenues or to a notice under s. 86(5) received by the Board.

Clauses 27(1) to 27(7)

These clauses would make several amendments related to the integration into the Act of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations regarding third-party management by the First Nations Financial Management Board. Specifically, these clauses would clarify that s. 53 would apply only in the context of imposed third-party management by the Board in situations relating to a loan secured by local revenues or to a notice under s. 33(3)(b) or s. 86(4) received by the Board.

Clause 27(6) would clarify that the First Nations Financial Management Board is not an agent or mandatary of the First Nations Finance Authority or the First Nations Tax Commission while exercising its role in third-party management. 

Along with the amendments related to the integration into the Act of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations, clause 27(7) also adds to s. 53 that the First Nations Financial Management Board may terminate third-party management stemming from a notice under s. 86(4) if the First Nations Finance Authority makes a written request – including its reasons – for the termination.

Clause 28

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would add a new s. 53.1 to both replicate the provisions of s. 53 of the Act and integrate elements of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations related to third-party management by the First Nations Financial Management Board, but provide that this new s. 53.1 would apply only in the context of imposed co-management by the Board in situations relating to a loan secured by other revenues or to a notice under s. 86(5) received by the Board.

Clause 29

This clause would make a minor amendment related to the integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations by adding an express reference to other revenues in s. 54.

Clause 30

This clause would make a minor amendment related to the integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations. Specifically, this clause would integrate the ability for the First Nations Financial Management Board to make procedures for the implementation or termination of a co-management arrangement or third-party management of a First Nation's other revenues.

Clause 31

This clause would add a new s. 55.1 that would empower the First Nations Financial Management Board to collect, analyze, and publish data for statistical purposes on matters within the scope of its mandate. This clause would provide protections for identifying information that may be contained within the data collected. Finally, it would provide the Board with the ability to enter into information sharing agreements.

Clause 32(1)

This clause would make a minor amendment related to the integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations. Specifically, this clause would enable the Governor in Council to make regulations respecting the implementation of a co-management arrangement or third-party management of a First Nation's other revenues.

Clause 32(2)

This clause would make a minor amendment to the French version of the Act related to integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations. Specifically, this clause would remove the reference to "des recettes locales" (local revenues) such that the provision enabling the Governor in Council to make regulations fixing fees for First Nations Financial Management Board services could also apply with respect to other revenues.

Clause 33

This clause would make a minor amendment to the French version of the Act related to the integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations.  Specifically, this clause would remove the reference to "des recettes locales" (local revenues) to ensure that the authority for the Governor in Council to make regulations enabling an entity referred to in s. 50.1(1) to obtain the services of the First Nations Financial Management Board (other than co-management and third-party management services) would also apply with respect to other revenues.

Clause 34

This clause would repeal the definitions of "long-term loan" and "short-term loan" in s. 57 of the Act as they are no longer needed due to changes to s. 31 of the Act contained in Clause 35 below.

Clause 35 (1)

This clause would: (i) integrate the content of the definitions of "long-term loan" and "short-term loan" that would be repealed by Clause 34 above; (ii) remove reference to "lease financing" in s. 74(a)(i); add reference to "refinancing"; and remove an unnecessary reference to laws made under s. 5(1)(b) in s. 74(a)(ii).

Clause 35(2)

This clause would change the term "financing" to "loans" to better reflect the services offered by the First Nations Finance Authority.

Clause 35(3)

As part of the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would integrate the purposes for which the First Nations Finance Authority could make loans to its borrowing members through the use of other revenues as security for the loans.

Clause 35(4)

This clause would remove the reference to "long-term" to better reflect the scope of the advice that could be provided by the First Nations Finance Authority.

Clause 36

This amendment to s. 77 is necessary in order to combine the existing debt reserve funds established under ss. 84(1)(a) and (b) into a single debt reserve fund. This clause would mean that, in order to cease to be a borrowing member, the borrowing member would require the consent of all other borrowing members, not just borrowing members with loans secured by a particular type of revenue.

Clause 37

This clause would make several amendments to s. 78 of the Act in order to: (i) capture any entities that could be participating in pooled borrowing under the Act by way of regulations made under s. 141 and 141.1 by replacing the term "First Nation" with the term "borrowing member"; (ii) clarify that the First Nations Finance Authority's priority over all other creditors of the borrowing member is for all moneys authorized or obligated to be paid to the Finance Authority; (iii) clarify all of the sources under which the moneys could be authorized or obligated to be paid; and (iv) support the integration of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations,  by replacing the reference to "a law made under paragraph 5(1)(b) or (d)" with a reference to "a law made by the borrowing member".

Clause 38(1)

This clause would remove the expressions "long-term" and "for the purpose of financing capital assets for the provision of local services on reserve lands" to broaden the scope of application of this limitation to all loans regardless of the length of their term or their purpose. The amendment to include the phrase "in respect of that loan" would add clarity.

Clause 38(2)

This clause would make addition amendments to s. 79 of the Act (to come into force at a later date than Clause 38(1)) that would set out the two different limitations – one that only applies to loans secured by property tax revenues and another that applies to loans secured by other revenues. The latter integrates the content of s. 17 of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations. At the same time, this clause also integrates the content of s. 18 of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations respecting the registry and publication of borrowing laws made under 8.1(1)(a) – see Clause 6 above.

Clause 39

This clause would integrate into ss. 80 and 81 of the Act the content of the definitions of "long-term loan" and "short term loan" that would be repealed by Clause 34 above. It would also clarify that the restriction on financing under s. 80 would only apply as long as a borrowing member has an outstanding loan from the First Nations Finance Authority.

Clause 40(1)

This clause would amend s. 84 of the Act to eliminate the requirement for the First Nations Finance Authority to maintain separate debt reserve funds for loans secured by property tax revenues and loans secured by other revenues, and instead require the Finance Authority to maintain a single debt reserve fund for all loans.

Clause 40(2)

This clause would amend s. 84(2) to require the First Nations Finance Authority to provision the debt reserve fund for financing secured by property tax revenues by withholding the required amounts of all loans secured by property tax revenues regardless of the length of their terms.

Clause 40(3)

This clause would make further amendments to s. 84 in order to combine the existing debt reserve funds established under ss. 84(1)(a) and (b) into a single debt reserve fund. It would also remove reference to a regulation fixing the percentage of the amount of a loan that should be withheld and placed into the debt reserve fund, as the regulation-making power would be repealed by Clause 42 below. Further, this clause would adjust the manner of calculating when debt reserve fund replenishment payments under s. 84(5) may be required in accordance with new regulations that will be used to determine when the debt reserve fund would need to be replenished by borrowing members. Finally, this clause would clarify that only those borrowing members with an outstanding loan from the First Nations Finance Authority could be called on by the Authority to replenish the debt reserve fund.

Clauses 41(1) to 41(3)

These clauses would make several amendments to s. 86 of the Act related to the integration of the provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations. In particular, this clause would: (i) distinguish, in s. 86(3), betweenrecommendations by the First Nations Financial Management Board for intervention under ss. 52 or 53 with respect to local revenues, or under ss. 52.1 or 53.1 with respect to other revenues; (ii) restrict required intervention under s. 86(4) to circumstances involving local revenues; and (iii) integrate, into a new s. 86(5), the adaptation to s. 86(4) from the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations for circumstances involving other revenues.

Additionally, Clauses 41(1) and 41(3) would provide that a copy of the First Nations Financial Management Board's report under s. 86(3) and copies of the First Nations Finance Authority's notices under ss. 86(4) and (5) must be provided to the First Nations Tax Commission.

Clause 42

This clause would add an authority for the Governor in Council to make regulations that are required for determining when the debt reserve fund would need to be replenished by borrowing members. This clause would also repeal the unused regulation-making authority contained in s. 89(b) – see Clause 40(3).

Clause 43

[First Nations Powers Respecting Services (ss. 96-100)]

(i) Power to Make Laws Respecting the Provision of Services

This clause would create a new Part 5.1 of the Act entitled "First Nations Powers Respecting Services."

In this part, First Nations would be empowered to make laws respecting the provision of services on their reserve lands as well as infrastructure used in the provision of those services [s. 97(1)]. For the purposes of this law-making power, "services" would be defined as services provided on reserve lands by or on behalf of a First Nation, and would include water, wastewater management, drainage, waste management, animal control, recreation, transportation, telecommunications, and energy.

Laws made under this law-making power would only apply within the geographical limits of the First Nation's reserve [s. 97(2)].

(ii) Enforcement of Laws Respecting the Provision of Services

First Nations would be able to ensure compliance with these laws through the use of a number of enforcement measures, including "stop work" and "do work" orders [s. 97(1)(c)(i) and (ii)] and discontinuance of services [s. 97(1)(c)(v)]. Further, First Nations would be able to recover costs incurred while enforcing their laws, including by imposing liens on reserve lands and interests or rights in reserve lands [s. 97(1)(c)(iii) and (iv)]. These enforcement measures would be subject to regulation by the Governor in Council [s. 97(6)].

In the event that a person or entity fails to comply with an order to "stop work" or "do work," First Nations would also be empowered to take corrective action at the expense of the person named in the order [s. 97(3)]. 

Like in Clauses 5(5) and 5(6) above, First Nations would also be expressly empowered to: apply to courts of competent jurisdiction for court orders directing persons or entities to comply with a service law; and enable First Nations with a land code or First Nation law under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management Act to use any enforcement provisions in their land code or law, other than those relating to summary conviction offences, to enforce their service laws [s. 97(4) and (5)].

(iii) Other Aspects of First Nation Laws

This clause would also provide for publication, judicial notice, exemption from the Statutory Instruments Act and coming into force of laws respecting the provision of services [ss. 97(7) to 100].

[First Nations Infrastructure Institute (ss. 101 – 113.92)

[Establishment and Organization of the Institute]

This clause would also create a new Part 5.2 of the Act entitled "First Nations Infrastructure Institute." This part would establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute ("Institute").

The Institute would be managed by a board of directors consisting of ten directors, including a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson [s. 102(1)]. The board of directors would be composed of individuals from across Canada, including members of First Nations. The Chairperson would hold office on a full-time basis, while the other directors would hold office on a part-time basis. The Chairperson would be the Chief Executive Officer of the Institute [s. 112(1)]. The remuneration of directors would be determined by the Governor in Council [s. 111].

The Institute would have the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person [s. 102(2)] and would not be an agent of His Majesty in right of Canada [s. 103].

(i) Initial Board of Directors

The Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, would appoint all of the directors on the first board of directors, including the Chairperson. These directors would hold office during good behaviour for a term not exceeding five years and would be subject to removal by the Governor In Council at any time for cause [s. 104].

(ii) Subsequent Boards of Directors

For all boards of directors subsequent to the initial board, the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, would only appoint three (of the ten) directors, including a Chairperson. These appointments would hold office during good behaviour for a term not exceeding five years and would be subject to removal by the Governor In Council at any time for cause [s. 105(1)]. Further, the Minister would be empowered to establish a committee to advise the Minister on the appointment of the two directors who are not the Chairperson, provided that the committee includes representation from the board of directors [s. 105(2)]. 

One or more bodies prescribed by regulation would appoint the other seven directors on all subsequent boards of directors. These directors would hold office during good behaviour for a term not exceeding five years and could be removed at any time for cause in accordance with rules and procedures established by the board of directors [ss. 105(3) and 108].

(iii) Powers of the Institute's Board of Directors [ss. 113 to 113.2]

The Institute's board of directors would have the power to make rules and procedures for the conduct of its meetings and for the appointment and removal of directors appointed by bodies prescribed by regulation, to determine additional qualifications for the appointment of directors, and to establish the length of directors' terms provided they do not exceed five years.

The board of directors would also have the power to hire staff, to determine the duties and conditions of their employment, and to fix their salary and benefits.

Finally, the board of directors would determine the location of the Institute's head office provided that it is located on reserve land.

[Purposes of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute—s. 113.3]

The Institute's mandate would be to:

[Functions and Powers—ss. 113.4 to 113.7]

To achieve its purposes, the Institute would be empowered to enter into partnerships, agreements and other arrangements with local, regional, national and international organizations to provide services to First Nations and s. 50.1(1) entities.

(i) Services

Upon request from a First Nation or s. 50.1(1) entity, the Institute would be able to provide services within the scope of its mandate, including: assistance with planning, developing, procuring, owning, operating and maintaining infrastructure; project management support; and review of funding and financing options for infrastructure.

(ii) Review of Infrastructure Projects and Certification

Upon request from a First Nation or s. 50.1(1) entity, the Institute would be able to review an infrastructure project (or an aspect of the project) involving that First Nation or entity for compliance with the Institute's standards. On completion of the review, the Institute would be required to provide the First Nation or entity with a report setting out whether, in the opinion of the Institute, the project complied with its standards. If the Institute were of the view that the project did comply with its standards, the Institute would provide the First Nation or entity with a certificate to that effect.

(iii) Review for Continued Compliance

Provided that the Institute has already certified the project in question (or an aspect of the project), the Institute would be able to review the project for continued compliance with its standards upon request from a First Nation or s. 50.1(1) entity or pursuant to the terms of an agreement involving any level of government.

As with the initial certification, the Institute would be required to provide the First Nation or s. 50.1(1) entity with a report setting out the scope of its review and its findings. If the Institute were of the opinion that the project no longer complied with its standards, the Institute would provide the First Nation or s. 50.1(1) entity with recommendations for how to bring the project back into compliance.

(iv) Review of Laws Respecting the Provision of Services

If a First Nation has made a law respecting the provision of services under Part 5.1 of the Act, the First Nation would be able to request the Institute's review of the law for compliance with the Institute's standards. If the Institute were of the opinion that the law complies with its standards, the Institute would be required to notify the First Nation in writing.

[Standards and Procedures—s. 113.8]

The Institute would be able to make standards respecting:

The Institute would also be able to make procedures respecting:

[Data Collection, Analysis and Publication—s. 113.9 to 113.91]

Like the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board (see Clauses 16 and 31 above), the Institute would be empowered to collect, analyze and publish data for statistical purposes. The Institute would be required to ensure that any information that could identify a particular First Nation, entity, or individual be removed prior to publication unless this information is already in the public domain or consent is obtained.

The Institute would be empowered to enter into information sharing agreements with First Nations, entities, individuals, and all levels of government.

[Regulations—113.92]

The Governor in Council would be empowered to make regulations, on the recommendation of the Minister made having regard to any representations of the Institute, prescribing fees the Institute may charge for its services and the manner in which these fees may be recovered.

Clause 44

This clause would amend the definitions of "institution" and "board of directors" in s. 114 of the Act in order to make Part 6 of the Act ("Financial Management and Control") apply to the Institute.

Clause 45

This clause would amend s. 118 of the Act to require that each institution establish a five-year corporate plan rather than an annual corporate plan for submission to the Minister for approval. Accordingly, the scope and content requirements for the corporate plans under s. 118(2) would be amended to reflect the new five-year period.

Clause 46

This clause would make minor amendments to ss. 120(2)(a)(iii) and 120(2)(b) to replace the gendered expression "his or her" with the gender-neutral term "their."

Clause 47

This clause would make a minor amendment to s. 122(1) of the Act to replace the gendered expression "his or her" with the gender-neutral term "their."

Clause 48(1)

This clause would provide that the board of directors would determine the manner in which its annual meetings are held: i.e. in-person, fully virtual, or hybrid. It would also provide that details of the meeting, including the date, time and location (if any), the means of participation and the availability of the annual report, be set out in a notice published on the institution's website (rather than in a major newspaper).

Clause 48(2)

This clause would ensure that all participants in the annual meeting would have access to the institution's most recent annual report (i.e. regardless of whether they participate in-person or electronically). This clause would also provide that only the commissioners, directors, and executive officers who attend the meeting are required to make themselves available to answer questions.

Clause 49

This clause would make amendments to ss. 132 to 134 of the Act to include the First Nations Infrastructure Institute.

Clause 50

This clause would amend s. 136 to include directors or employees of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute or persons acting on its behalf.

Clause 51

This clause would amend s. 136.1 of the Act as part of the integration of the content of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations to ensure that the limitation on liability is also applicable to intervention in the other revenues context.

Clause 52(1)

This clause would amend s. 138(1) of the Act to include laws respecting the provision of services alongside local revenues laws such that they would both have the same relationship relative to the other federal laws listed in this section.

Clause 52(2)

As part of the integration of the content of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act, this clause would amend s. 138(1) of the Act to include other revenue laws alongside local revenue laws and laws respecting the provision of services, such that they would all have the same relationship relative to the other federal laws listed in this section.

Clause 53

This clause would make amendments to s. 139(2) of the Act to include the First Nations Infrastructure Institute and provide that the Institute must provide services in either of Canada's official languages when there is significant demand for a particular language.

Clause 54

This clause would amend s. 140(a) of the Act to include a power for the Governor in Council to prescribe by regulation one or more bodies that would appoint directors to the First Nations Infrastructure Institute's boards of directors in accordance with s. 105(3)—see Clause 43 above. This clause would also amend s. 140(b) to include the First Nations Infrastructure Institute such that the Governor in Council may make regulations that could also apply to the Institute respecting required insurance coverage.

Clause 55

This clause would amend s. 141(1) of the Act by removing the phrase "that is not a band as defined in subsection 2(1) of the Indian Act" in light of the fact that there are Indigenous groups that are parties to Self-Government and other Final Agreements that remain, for certain purposes, bands within the meaning of the Indian Act but who may seek to participate in aspects of the Act by way of regulations made under s. 141.

This clause would also amend s. 141 by replacing the term "Aboriginal" with the term "Indigenous."

Clause 56

This clause would renumber s. 141.1 of the Act to s. 141.1(1) and would add a new subsection (2) that would enable the Minister to, at the request of an organization referred to in paragraph 50.1(1)(e), add, change, or delete the name of such an organization in a schedule to regulations made under this section. The Minister's powers under s. 141.1(2) would resemble the Minister's powers under s. 141(2). Regulations under ss. 141 and 141.1 have not yet been made, but being named in the schedule would be necessary in order to participate in aspects of the Act by way of those regulations.

Clause 57

This clause would repeal s. 142 of the Act as part of the integration of the content of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act.

Clause 58

This clause would make a consequential amendment to the Access to Information Act to include the First Nations Infrastructure Institute in Schedule I of that Act under the heading "Other Government Institutions."

Clause 59

This clause would make a consequential amendment to the Privacy Act to include the First Nations Infrastructure Institute in the Schedule of that Act under the heading "Other Government Institutions."

Clause 60

This clause would provide a transitional period related to the change from annual corporate plans to five-year corporate plans under Clause 45. During this transitional period, the First Nations Tax Commission, First Nations Financial Management Board and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would have a choice as to whether to produce an annual corporate plan or a five-year corporate plan.

Clause 61

This clause would provide a transition period during which ss. 118, 120(4), and 121 to 131 would not apply to the First Nations Infrastructure Institute. This transitional "grace period" would ensure that the obligations under these sections would not apply until all of the directors of the Institute have been appointed and the Institute has had time to become fully operational.

This clause would also provide a transitional "grace period" before the Institute must call its first annual general meeting.

Clause 62

This clause would address a transitional administrative oversight that followed the creation in 2019 of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and the Department of Indigenous Services.

Clause 63

While many of the provisions of this bill would come into force on Royal Assent, this clause would allow for the coming into force of certain other provisions at a later date by order of the Governor in Council so that the latter provisions could come into force simultaneously with consequential and other associated regulatory amendments. For example, regulatory amendments are needed in order to coordinate with the integration of the content of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act.

Questions & Answers

Amendments to FNFMA and Engagement

Q1. What are the gaps experienced by First Nations that the proposed amendments would address?

A1. The pandemic exposed the heightened vulnerability of Indigenous communities due to significant longstanding socio-economic, infrastructure, institutional and regulatory gaps compared to the rest of Canada, as well as gaps in the operations of the existing First Nations Fiscal Management Act. These include:

  • The regime is supporting significant investments by First Nations in infrastructure and economic development without access to a national institution for infrastructure capacity.
  • First Nations need expanded law-making powers for the provision of local services related to infrastructure.
  • First Nations need additional tools for the enforcement of their laws under the Act.
  • The institutions lack timely and reliable data to monitor and forecast the economic growth of First Nations and to support evidence-based planning and decision-making on fiscal and economic objectives.
  • The Institutions are limited by outdated mandates in the services they are able to provide to First Nations under the Act.
Q2. What is First Nations' participation in the regime and how has it been evolving?

A2. As of April , 2023, there were 348 First Nations scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA), with participation from First Nations across the country (with the exception of Yukon). Initially, uptake for the regime remained modest, with a strong regional representation from British Columbia First Nations, as the fiscal institutions originated from that region. Between January 2011 and March 2020, the regime experienced sustained growth and regional diversification, with approximately 26 First Nations added to the schedule on average annually. While uptake slowed down during the COVID-19 pandemic, as communities faced more pressing issues, 25 additional First Nations joined the regime in 2022, in line with the pre-COVID growth rate.

By the end of 2024-25, the number of First Nations participating in the regime is expected to reach close to 400 (i.e. two thirds of all First Nations).

Q3. Why are amendments being introduced now?

A3.  The First Nations Fiscal Management Act is an important part of the Government of Canada's commitment to a renewed Nation-to-Nation relationship with Indigenous Peoples and to advance self-determination. This Bill builds on previous amendments to the Act to expand and modernize the mandates and services of the institutions to support the next step in the evolution of the regime, including the establishment of a new institution on infrastructure. The proposed amendments include concrete steps to begin to address key barriers to economic development for Indigenous Peoples.

The Act provides First Nations with a legislative and institutional framework to strengthen their financial management systems and capacity, generate revenues from property taxation to support the delivery of services in their communities, and access long-term financing from the bond market to build community and economic infrastructure, similar to other governments in Canada.

The COVID-19 pandemic increased the strain on governments worldwide as they turned to fiscal tools, public institutions, and regulatory frameworks to respond to the urgent health and safety needs of their citizens. For First Nations with enduring institutional and regulatory gaps and socio-economic factors, the pandemic exacerbated an already dire health and safety situation. These gaps heightened the need for the FNFMA to evolve and broaden the supports available to First Nations to tackle future crises, strengthen their economies, and achieve self-determination in the areas of financial governance, local revenues, and access to capital markets.

They also illustrated a need for a fourth institute under the Act to provide the infrastructure-specific capacity services to support closing infrastructure gaps, enable First Nations scheduled to the Act to take on jurisdiction to regulate the use of infrastructure on reserve, and support First Nations and other interested Indigenous communities to implement more sustainable infrastructure projects. As Canada continues to make significant investments in Indigenous infrastructure and housing, these disparities, starting with the institutional and regulatory gaps, must be addressed to ensure that Indigenous communities can build sustainable infrastructure that meet the needs of their members over the long term, while also supporting economic reconciliation and self-determination.

Q4. How were the legislative amendments developed?

A4.  CIRNAC and the First Nations-led institutions under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act have established a strong working relationship over the past two decades. The legislative amendments were co-developed with the First Nations Tax Commission, the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Finance Authority, and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board. They originate from enhancements to the regime proposed directly by the institutions and the feedback of the First Nations who have chosen to participate under this Act, in order to address some of the institutional and regulatory gaps that First Nations are facing, and to improve their operations.

Regarding the establishment of a First Nation Infrastructure Institute more specifically, the concept was first proposed by the First Nations Tax Commission in 2016-17. Through support from the federal government, the First Nations Tax Commission established a First Nations Infrastructure Development Board, which has been actively engaging with First Nations, regional organizations, and other infrastructure organizations in all provinces and territories through a variety of information sessions, webinars, and presentations. Additionally, a First Nations Infrastructure Technical Working Group was formed to support the legislative work, organizational design, and development of service offering of the new First Nation Infrastructure Institute, which were also informed by the delivery of proof of concept demonstration projects with the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point, Sts'ailes and Paq'tnkek First Nations, the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority and the First Nations Health Authority. These projects included collaboration on procurement policies, utility planning, feasibility studies, business cases, procurement options, procurement bundling and financial models.

The leadership of the institutions under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, the feedback and lived experience from their member First Nations, and the input from partner regional Indigenous organizations, has been instrumental in the co-development of proposed legislative amendments.

Q5. What consultation and engagement activities took place during the development of this Bill?

A5. These amendments have been driven by the feedback of First Nations who have chosen to participate under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act. Given the technical nature of past amendments to the Act, consultation and engagement have traditionally been targeted at the FNFMA institutions. However, given the broad scope of the proposed amendments, as well as the coming into force of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, Canada and the FNFMA institutions worked together to extend consultation and cooperation opportunities to First Nations scheduled to the Act, National Indigenous Organizations, the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) and Modern Treaty and Self Government Agreement holders.

Canada and the FNFMA institutions have provided information on the proposed amendments, including the establishment of the First Nations Infrastructure Institution on several occasions over the past couple of years, including to First Nations scheduled to the Act, at the First Nations Leading the Way Conference, held in Winnipeg, MB from October 4-6, 2022. The proposed amendments were positively received, and Canada and the FNFMA institutions committed to providing more information on the amendments to the scheduled First Nations as soon as it was available.

In early 2023, additional consultations and information sharing took place to support the development of the amendments. In early January 2023, Canada and the institutions shared a letter to all First Nations scheduled under the Act providing  a high-level overview of the proposed changes to the Act with a link to the Government of Canada website where further information on the Act and the regime could be found, and inviting them to a virtual information session that was held on January 26, 2023. 

At the end of January, additional letters were sent to National Indigenous Organizations (the Assembly of First Nations, the Métis National Council and Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami), the Manitoba Métis Federation and Modern Treaty and Self Government Agreement holders, providing a high-level overview of the proposed changes to the Act and additional communications inviting them to a virtual information session, which was held on February 21, 2023.  Additional information sessions are being offered upon request.

Q6. Why are the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute seeking explicit data functions under the Act?

A6. Since the First Nations Statistical Institute that was formerly under the FNFMA closed in 2012, none of the remaining institutions have had the statutory function to collect and assess First Nations' financial or economic data. Most recently, this dearth of information proved detrimental when the institutions and the federal government needed to assess the financial impact of the COVID-19 lockdown measures on First Nation economies. At Canada's request, the First Nations Financial Management Board and First Nations Tax Commission undertook urgent research early in the pandemic to address this gap which enabled Canada to provide targeted First Nation relief programs for their losses in revenues due to closures. This type of data is essential to the operations of the institutions and their ability to respond to the needs of First Nations operating under the FNFMA regime. The amendments will enhance the institutions' capacity on an ongoing basis to support First Nations with evidence-based planning and decision-making on fiscal and economic objectives.

Q7. What is being done for Métis, Inuit, Treaty and Self-Governing First Nations and Indigenous groups that are currently not able to opt into the First Nations Fiscal Management Act?

A7.  As part of the proposed amendments, the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute will be empowered to provide many of their services to non-scheduled entities, including interested treaty and self-governing First Nations, as well as other Indigenous groups and organizations upon request. This could include services such as capacity building, advisory services, and financial management systems review. Inuit and Métis communities and Indigenous organizations would be able to access these services should they wish to do so.

While these amendments would propose to broaden access to most of the services of the institutions, the pooled borrowing (loans) aspects of the regime would need to remain limited. Pooled borrowing would only be available upon scheduling to the Act to ensure that the necessary protections are in place for other participants in the borrowing.

To this end, the federal government is also working with the First Nations Fiscal Management Act institutions, the Province of British Columbia, and interested self-governing First Nations on regulations to adapt the Act to enable self-governing First Nations and Indigenous organizations to benefit from the pooled borrowing regime. Significant work has progressed to co-develop an approach and draft regulations through a working group of representatives with a revised draft to be advanced in 2023. Similar work is underway for Indigenous not-for-profit organizations such as Indigenous health authorities or Indigenous education authorities. The work to co-develop the approach and adapt regulations will continue throughout 2023-2024. Exploration with interested Métis and Inuit partners will follow.

Q8. What are the Default Management and Prevention Pilot Projects and the 10-Year Grants?

A8. The Default Management and Prevention Pilot Projects and the 10-Year Grants are two key successful initiatives that have been in operation for several years (since 2016 and 2018 respectively), that resulted from joint policy work on a new approach by Indigenous Services Canada, the Assembly of First Nations and the Financial Management Board.

Through the former, the Financial Management Board is supporting First Nations to build strong governance and financial practices that have resulted in all of the participating First Nations either moving to a lower level of intervention or moving out of default management completely. Similarly, the Financial Management Board's work on the 10-Year Grant is assisting eligible First Nations to access flexible and predictable long term federal funding to better address their needs and priorities.

Q9. Will there be more amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act in the future?

A9.  The institutions under the Act have been the driving forces behind past and current amendments. We expect that the institutions will continue to play a leadership role in this respect and will propose new amendments in the future to further the evolution of the regime and address the changing needs of their members.

First Nations Infrastructure Institute

Q10. Why is it proposed to establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute?

A10. First Nations are experiencing gaps related to infrastructure capacity, standards, best practices, and institutional supports available to assist them with the development and management of infrastructure throughout its lifecycle. The proposed First Nations Infrastructure Institute would provide individual First Nations and their organizations with the capacity supports and tools needed for improved infrastructure outcomes.

There are also gaps in the regulatory powers available to First Nations respecting the use of infrastructure. Accordingly, First Nation infrastructure takes longer to develop, costs more to build and has a shorter lifespan, increasing costs for all stakeholders involved in projects, including Canada.

Building on the success of the Act, a First Nations Infrastructure Institute initiative was first proposed by the Tax Commission in 2016-17 to help address these enduring gaps related to infrastructure capacity, and institutional supports. Through support from Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada and Indigenous Services Canada, an interim First Nations-led Development Board and a Technical Working Group have been established to scope out the service offering of a First Nations Infrastructure Institute and to advance the organizational design through engagement with local, regional and national stakeholders.

Proof-of-concept demonstration projects with the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point, Sts'ailes and Paq'tnkek First Nations, the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority and the First Nations Health Authority have helped in identifying different service requirements and informing the development of processes, procedures and standards and organizational design, to avoid overlap with existing regional technical organizations, and complement and support the infrastructure service transfers to Indigenous organizations.

Q11. Why is it proposed to establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute under the FNFMA?

A11. The FNFMA has proven to be an effective legislative and institutional framework to address capacity, risk management and regulatory gaps, and to support First Nations exercising their jurisdiction outside of the Indian Act.

When engaging nationally on the need and organizational structure of a national infrastructure institution, drawing from the lessons learned from joint research, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board recommended that the First Nations Infrastructure Institute be established as a shared governance institution under the FNFMA.

Establishing the First Nations Infrastructure Institute under the FNFMA would provide scheduled First Nations with new law-making powers outside of the Indian Act for the provision of services related to the use of infrastructure. This would also provide for seamless interoperability with the other FNFMA institutions. For instance, regulations on the use of and access to infrastructure (under the regulatory framework of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute) could be combined with user fees (under the fiscal framework of the First Nations Tax Commission) to support fiscally sustainable public utilities for water, wastewater, solid waste, transportation, energy and recreation utilities.

The legislative and regulatory framework of the FNFMA also provides certainty and legitimacy for the mandate, purposes, activities and governance of the institutions, and ensures accountability for federal core funding.

Other similar infrastructure organizations are also established under federal, provincial or municipal legislations or regimes. The Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation's (OILC) corporate governance structure is set out in the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation Act. Infrastructure BC is owned by the Province of British Columbia. The Canada Infrastructure Bank was established under the Canada Infrastructure Bank Act.

Q12. What services are proposed to be provided by the First Nations Infrastructure Institute?

A12. The First Nations Infrastructure Institute would offer infrastructure-specific capacity building, knowledge transfer, advisory support and certification services to assist communities and their organizations to assume jurisdiction over their infrastructure and to improve infrastructure outcomes for their members.

The Infrastructure Institute's proposed approach is focused on improving its clients' infrastructure outcomes through the use of standards and industry best practices at all stages of the infrastructure life-cycle, including planning, development, operation and maintenance. The First Nations Infrastructure Institute would provide the skills, technical support and processes necessary to ensure its clients efficiently and effectively plan, develop, procure, implement, own, manage, and operate and maintain infrastructure assets on their land.

Supports and services related to the planning, implementation and management of infrastructure projects would be available to all First Nations, including those with self-governing and modern treaty agreements, as well as other Indigenous groups and organizations.

The Infrastructure Institute would also support interested First Nations governments who are scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to assume jurisdiction over their infrastructure and to establish laws that would regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in respect to the provision of services and the use of local infrastructure on their lands. This support would include standards development, sample regulatory law development, and a law review service upon request.

The Infrastructure Institute is not meant to fund projects, provide engineering or architectural services, act as a contractor, builder or operator, or make any decision with respect to infrastructure projects.

The Infrastructure Institute's services would be accessible upon request, and the level of support and type of services provided by the Institute would be adapted to the needs and capacity of each client.

The Infrastructure Institute would be a national institution with regional footprints across the country. It has been designed to collaborate with regional organizations, complementing their service offering without overlapping.

Q13. Who would be able to access the services of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute?

A13. In addition to working with First Nations scheduled to the Act, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would provide services to First Nations under the Indian Act; Aboriginal groups that are parties to treaties, land claims or self-governing agreements with Canada or with a province; tribal councils; entities owned or controlled by First Nations or Aboriginal groups, or established under or as a result of treaties, land claims or self-governing agreements; and not-for-profit organizations established to provide public services to First Nations or Aboriginal groups and individuals.

However, only First Nations scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act would be able to enact laws related to the use of infrastructure under the First Nations Infrastructure Institute's law-making powers.

For greater clarity, this means that Métis and Inuit communities and/or organizations can benefit from the services of the Infrastructure Institute.

Q14. What types of infrastructure assets could be supported by the First Nations Infrastructure Institute?

A14. The Infrastructure Institute would be able to assist Indigenous communities and organizations with various infrastructure projects, including water and wastewater, transportation improvement, communications, connectivity, and community energy projects, as well as with community buildings and facilities. This would also include assistance in the planning for space for First Nation government administration, health centres, nursing stations, treatment centres, and schools, as well as spaces for child and family services, recreation and cultural uses.

Q15. Would the First Nations Infrastructure Institute's services be mandatory?

A15. The First Nations Infrastructure Institute's services would be optional, like the services of the other institutions under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act. Interested Indigenous communities and organizations would have to submit a request to the Infrastructure Institute to access their services. They can visit www.fnii.ca for more details and contact information.

Q16. How would the First Nations Infrastructure Institute assist its clients with project management?

A16. The Infrastructure Institute would encompass a suite of standards, tools and related internal processes to be able to support a wide range of infrastructure projects, at any stage of the infrastructure life-cycle, providing capacity and advisory support to interested clients.

The institute would assist its clients in planning, developing, procuring, implementing, owning, managing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure. This includes providing review, analysis, assessment, certification and monitoring services to its clients, as well as supporting the development and delivery of training and educational material and tools.

Q17. Do interested Indigenous communities and organizations have to wait until the First Nations Infrastructure Institute is formally established to seek their support?

A17. The Infrastructure Institute has been operating on a pilot basis and will continue to do so while the proposed legislation seeks to have it  formally established under the Act. Interested Indigenous communities and organizations can contact the Infrastructure Institute to access capacity building tools or seek its support on infrastructure projects.

Q18. Would the establishment of First Nations Infrastructure Institute duplicate the services of other infrastructure organizations?

A18. No. Pilot projects undertaken by the Infrastructure Institute have helped in identifying different service requirements and informing the development of processes, procedures, standards and organizational design to complement existing regional technical organizations and to support the infrastructure service transfers to Indigenous organizations. The Institute is by no mean expected to take over the roles and responsibilities of existing organizations – instead, it would be able to work with those organizations to better serve the communities without overlapping.

The Infrastructure Institute is not meant to fund projects, provide engineering or architectural services, act as a contractor, builder or operator, or make any decision with respect to infrastructure projects. As such, it would not replace current players or disrupt its clients' existing relationships with infrastructure stakeholders.

The Infrastructure Institute would be created to help address capacity, institutional and regulatory gaps that First Nations and other Indigenous entities are facing in the development and management of infrastructure throughout its lifecycle.

Q19. What are the differences between the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority, the proposed new First Nations Water Commissionand the First Nations Infrastructure Institute?

A19. These organizations have been designed to complement each other and existing organizations and would have discrete and separate roles and responsibilities related to infrastructure.

For example, the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority is a newly established regionally based service provider that operates, maintains, and upgrades central water and wastewater infrastructure on its member First Nations reserve lands. The First Nations Water Commission that is contemplated as part of the development of a legislative proposal for First Nations drinking water and wastewater, on the other hand, would support First Nations nationally in monitoring the quality of drinking water as well as wastewater treatment and disposal. Finally, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would offer nationally to First Nations and their organizations capacity supports and tools across all infrastructure classes for a more holistic and integrated approach to infrastructure planning.

The Atlantic First Nations Water Authority is already in operation and has been designed to provide funding for operations and capital upgrades to community systems, and will assume responsibility for water and wastewater assets, operate and maintain water and wastewater systems on behalf of Atlantic First Nations communities. The Water Authority is also responsible for operators, engineers, for maintaining clean and safe drinking water and for the treatment and discharge of wastewater. This also includes procurement and purchase of equipment, parts, chemicals, storage, repairs, maintenance and will advise on water and wastewater capital upgrades to ensure sufficient capacity for the new development.

The First Nations Water Commission being contemplated as part of water and wastewater legislation would support First Nations with the monitoring of drinking water, source water and wastewater treatment and disposal and certification of water services. It could also provide advice and legal opinions on drinking water and wastewater, make recommendations to federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and First Nations in relation to drinking water and wastewater, including for laws, regulations, policies, guidelines and the drafting of model laws and provide other services in relation to planning, coordination and reporting in relation to drinking water, wastewater and source water on or under First Nation lands, although the final structure, activities, and purpose of the proposed institution have yet to be determined.

The First Nations Infrastructure Institute is proposed to provide individual First Nations with the tools, capacity, best practices and bench strength they need for multi-asset classes strategic planning, implementation and management on a more holistic basis to bring communities basic infrastructure requirements and economic development aspirations together.

Law-Making and Enforcement

Q20. What type of new regulatory powers would be exercised by First Nations under the FNFMA?

A20. First Nations scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act can already make fiscal laws regarding property taxation, including fees for the provision of services, the use of facilities, permit, licenses or other authorization, in relation to water, sewers, waste management, animal control, recreation and transportation, as well as any other similar services; however, the ability to regulate those services and the use of local infrastructure is limited and currently only available outside the FNFMA regime.

The proposed new law-making power would enable scheduled First Nations to make laws respecting the provision of services provided on reserve lands by or on behalf of First Nations, and to regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in respect of those services. Examples could include specific laws regulating the installation of water meters and the access to those meters, laws regulating weight limits of vehicles allowed on roads or bridges and seasonal restrictions, laws regulating use and access of parks, sports facilities.

In the long term, these new regulatory powers are expected to support infrastructure use on reserve and to improve its sustainability.

Q21. What type of regulatory powers would be exercised by First Nations contemplated as part of the development of a legislative proposal for First Nations drinking water and wastewater?

A21. The proposal contemplated as part of the development of a legislative proposal for First Nations drinking water and wastewater would affirm inherent right, jurisdiction and legislative authority of First Nations over drinking water, wastewater and related infrastructure as well as the power to administer and enforce laws made under that legislative authority and to provide for dispute resolution mechanisms in those laws.

It would also provide the Governor in Council, on the Minister of Indigenous Services recommendation, with the power to make regulations respecting water services on First Nation lands, including regulations respecting the management of water services, the protection of source water, consultation, training and certification of water services operators, occupational health and safety, monitoring, assessment, inspection and review of water services, emergency planning and response and recovery, permits, licenses and other authorizations including issuance, suspension and revocation, information management, administration and enforcement of regulations and the creation of offences and imposition of penalties, minimum standards in respect of water services including the quality and the quantity of drinking water. 

Q22. What would be the First Nations Infrastructure Institute's role in supporting First Nation regulatory development?

A22. Similar to the First Nations Financial Management Board and First Nations Tax Commission, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would provide capacity supports to First Nations interested in developing laws to regulate the use of their infrastructure through the development of standards and sample laws, and by providing a legal review of draft First Nation regulations against these standards at the request of a First Nation. The First Nations Infrastructure Institute would not have any approval power over First Nations laws.

Q23. What are the enhanced enforcement provisions being proposed? How would it be different from what is currently available to First Nations under local revenue laws?

A23. To better ensure compliance with local revenue laws and laws respecting the provision of services on reserves under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, proposed amendments include a range of enforcement measures available to other levels of government.

For example, it is proposed to broaden the scope of paragraph 5(1)(e) of the Act to allow First Nations to make laws enforcing all aspects of their local revenue laws, not only "outstanding taxes, charges or fees" as the Act currently states.

The proposed amendments would expressly permit First Nations to apply to courts of competent jurisdiction for court orders directing persons or entities to comply with their laws. The proposed amendments would also expressly permit First Nations to collect amounts owing to the First Nations under their local revenue laws, including interest and penalties, as applicable.

These amendments are expected to clarify First Nations' enforcement powers under the Act and to facilitate their access to courts of competent jurisdiction.

The proposed amendments would also enable First Nations scheduled to the FNFMA who are operating with a land code under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management to use civil enforcement measures included in their land management laws to enforce their FNFMA laws.

The proposed amendments do not include powers to create or prosecute criminal offenses. Canada is currently working on whole-of-government solutions to the long-standing barriers respecting the enforcement of laws in Indigenous communities.  

Q24. Will First Nations have to amend their current local revenue laws passed under the FNFMA to have access to these proposed enforcement provisions?

A24. First Nations would need to assess the content of their own laws to determine whether amendments would be necessary in order to exercise these new compliance and enforcement powers.

Q25. The title of the proposed Bill refers to clarification to another Act. What is this about?

A25. The clarification is required to address a transitional administrative oversight that followed the creation in 2019 of the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and the Department of Indigenous Services.

Alignment With Other Policy Documents

Q26. How are the proposed amendments helping address recommendations of the INAN report on Barriers to Economic Development in Indigenous Communities?

A26. The proposed amendments are helping address the recommendations from the INAN report on Barriers to Economic Development in Indigenous Communities including:

Recommendation 10: That the Government of Canada work with the National Indigenous Economic Development Board, as well as other Indigenous organizations and education organizations that partner with First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities to support literacy, such as the Martin Family Initiative, to explore the possibility of establishing a National Indigenous Education Institution or Centre of Excellence.

Budget 2022 investments and the support for the Tulo Centre of Indigenous Economics, through the First Nations Tax Commission, provide access for Indigenous groups across Canada and the world, to university accredited courses on how to leverage modern legislation like the First Nations Fiscal Management Act and the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management. All of this furthers communities' socio-economic development away from the Indian Act.

Recommendation 12: That the Government of Canada, in collaboration with First Nations partners (including the First Nations Finance Authority, the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board), co-develop amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to establish a legislative basis for a First Nations Infrastructure Institute.

The proposed amendments, co-developed with the First Nations Fiscal Management Act institutions and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board, would establish a First Nations infrastructure institute under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to ensure that First Nations and other Indigenous groups, as well as their organizations, have access to the tools and capacity they need to develop more sustainable infrastructure.

Recommendation 13: That the Government of Canada increase the resources available to the First Nations Finance Authority (FNFA), the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board to ensure that they can fulfill their mandates under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA).

The recent investments of $54.3 million over 5 years for the First Nations Fiscal Management Act institutions and $15.1 million over 3 years to support the establishment of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act and the proposed amendments would modernize and expand the mandate of the institutions allowing them to better serve their current First Nation clients and to provide financial, fiscal and infrastructure management capacity building services and support to additional communities, Indigenous groups, aggregates and organizations. This would eventually increase the client base for the First Nations Finance Authority. The Authority works very closely with the major Canadian banks and credit rating agencies and has entrenched itself as a trusted issuer on global capital markets.

Recommendation 14: That the Government of Canada, in collaboration with First Nations partners (including the First Nations Tax Commission), explore the possibility of expanding First Nations fiscal powers, including with respect to taxation.

The proposed amendments would allow First Nations with fiscal and local revenues, such as the First Nations Goods and Services Taxes, to benefit from collective borrowing powers and access to long-term low interest rates financing on the same basis as First Nations with other revenues.

Recommendation 15: That the Government of Canada expand the mandate of the First Nations Finance Authority to enable it to provide its services to tribal councils, self-governing Indigenous governments and economic development corporations; and that the Government of Canada ensure that the First Nations Finance Authority has the resources necessary to fulfill this expanded mandate.

The Department is currently working with Indigenous groups and the Province of British Columbia on regulations that would provide access to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act borrowing regime to Indigenous groups that are party to a treaty, self-government agreement or land claim. The Department is also working on regulations to allow not-for-profit organizations, established to provide public services to Indigenous groups or Indigenous people, to also access financing through the First Nations Finance Authority. The proposed amendments are laying the legislative foundation for the implementation of these upcoming regulations.

Recommendation 16: That the Government of Canada work with First Nations to eliminate all barriers to economic development arising from the discriminatory and constraining provisions of the Indian Act.

The proposed amendments would enhance the First Nations Fiscal Management Act and offer effective solutions to address barriers to economic development and rebuild the economies of Indigenous communities and First Nations outside of the Indian Act.

Q27. How are the proposed amendments helping address recommendations from the National Indigenous Economic Strategy For Canada 2022 - Pathways to Socioeconomic Parity for Indigenous Peoples?

A27. Support for the First Nations Fiscal Management Act regime, recent investments and the proposed amendments contribute towards the four Strategic Pathways for reconciliation and rebuilding Indigenous economies of the National Indigenous Economic Strategy:

The People: The expanded mandates of the institutions would extend capacity building services to other Indigenous groups and aggregate organizations, to strengthen their financial and fiscal governance and therefore enable greater participation in the economy.

The Lands: The proposed new law making powers would provide communities with jurisdiction over the usage and access of their infrastructure for sustainable assets and economic development purposes.

The Infrastructure: The establishment of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would provide communities with the support and capacity to manage and participate in infrastructure and economic development projects.

Finance: The FNFMA regime provides borrowing member First Nations with access to the capital markets and the expanded mandate of the institutions are removing barriers to accessing capital for other Indigenous groups through financial and fiscal management capacity building.

Q28. How could the proposed First Nations Infrastructure Institute interact with the Canada Infrastructure Bank?

A28. Upon request, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute could support a First Nation that is seeking to obtain a loan from the Canada Infrastructure Bank. This could include assisting the First Nation in building a solid business case, financial model and/or asset management plan, which would be assessed by the Bank as part of its investment review process. Upon loan approval, the Infrastructure Institute could also help with the aspects of the implementation of the project including the certification of an asset management plan against the Institute's applicable standards, and conduct periodic reviews to ensure continued compliance with the standards, should it be requested by the First Nation or in its lending agreement with the Canada Infrastructure Bank.

More generally, the proposed First Nations Infrastructure Institute would be empowered to collaborate with government organizations such as the Canada Infrastructure Bank, to support and advise on the development of legal and administrative frameworks to improve the planning, development, procurement, management, operation and maintenance of infrastructure, and could enter into agreements concerning the sharing of information for research, analysis and publication purposes.

Q29. How are the proposed amendments supporting infrastructure investments that would generate better outcomes for Indigenous communities?

A29. Amendments to the Canada Infrastructure Bank Act, that were proposed through Private Member Bill C-245, aimed at prioritizing investments and infrastructure projects that are sustainable, environmentally friendly and in the public and indigenous communities interests.

A key priority for the proposed First Nations Infrastructure Institute would be to provide the skills and processes necessary to ensure First Nations and Indigenous organizations can efficiently and effectively plan, procure, own and manage infrastructure assets on their lands, leading to more resilient and sustainable infrastructure and greater socio-economic outcomes for communities.

As part of its mandate, the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would be able to conduct research and provide advice and information to the Government of Canada, including the Canada Infrastructure Bank, on the development and implementation of frameworks to support the development of infrastructure that is socially, culturally, environmentally, economically and fiscally sustainable, which is in line with the purpose of Bill C-245. Bill C-245 was defeated at second reading on June 22, 2022.

Leasing of Reserve Lands & Resource Extraction

Q30. Does the FNFMA allow for the leasing of reserve lands and what would be the impact of this?

A30. The FNFMA does not have provisions to allow the leasing of reserve lands.

Q31. Can First Nations tax natural resource projects?

A31. First Nations can use the provisions of the FNFMA to raise local revenues related to natural resource projects on reserve lands in several ways. For instance, they can work with the First Nations Tax Commission to develop a Business Activity Tax. The First Nations Tax Commission has already developed several sample Business Activity Tax laws and could work with interested First Nations to develop solutions tailored to their needs. They could also work with the First Nations Tax Commission to explore other options, including Development Cost Charges and Service Fee Laws, which directly fund or offset the cost of providing services to projects on reserve.

Issue Papers

Overview

History

This act seeks to make several updates and key changes to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA), an opt-in regime which has been in place since 2006. The proposed amendments were co-developed with the institutions of the Act; the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Finance Authority, as well as the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board. The proposed amendments were developed based on the institutions' and First Nations' identification of gaps and issues within the current Act.

Objective

The proposed amendments seek to advance Indigenous self-determination and economic reconciliation by amending the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to expand and strengthen the mandates of the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board to reflect their evolving purposes. Furthermore, the amendments would establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute (FNII) under the FNFMA to support First Nations scheduled to the Act as they regulate the services provided by or on behalf of them on reserve lands, and to provide First Nations and other interested Indigenous groups and organizations with the tools, capacity, and best practices to implement and manage sustainable infrastructure.

Engagement

To support the development of the proposed amendments, engagement was carried out in three phases. First, the proposed amendments were co-developed with the three FNFMA institutions and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board over the past several years. The second phase of consultation and engagement targeted First Nations scheduled to the Act and was planned and carried out in partnership with the FNFMA institutions and the FNII Development Board. Finally, the third phase of consultation included the National Indigenous Organizations, the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) and Modern Treaty and Self Government Agreement holders.

Proposed Amendments

Summary of the Proposal

The proposed amendments seek to advance Indigenous self-determination and economic reconciliation by amending the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA) to expand and strengthen the mandates of the First Nations Tax Commission and the First Nations Financial Management Board to reflect their evolving purposes. Furthermore, the amendments would establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute (FNII) under the FNFMA to support First Nations scheduled to the Act as they regulate the services provided by or on behalf of them on reserve lands, and to provide First Nations and other interested Indigenous groups and organizations with the tools, capacity, and best practices to implement and manage sustainable infrastructure.

Background

The FNFMA received Royal Assent on March 23, 2005 and came into force on April 1, 2006. The Act is an alternative to the Indian Act regime that provides First Nations with a legislative and institutional framework through which to assert jurisdiction in the areas of financial management, taxation, and access to capital markets. With the support of the three First Nation-led institutions established under the Act (the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Finance Authority), First Nations strengthen their financial administration capacity and systems to establish a strong foundation of good governance in their communities. Since its establishment, the results of the regime have been significant with 348 First Nations participating under the Act, leading to the creation of jobs, new sources of sustainable revenues, and an overall strengthening of First Nations economies.

The First Nations Financial Management Board (the Financial Management Board) is a shared governance institution that assists First Nations in strengthening their individual financial management regimes.

The First Nations Tax Commission (the Tax Commission) is a shared governance corporation that oversees a transparent and accountable process for the development of property tax and assessment laws of First Nations that have opted into the FNFMA.

The First Nations Finance Authority (the Finance Authority) is a not-for-profit corporation that provides financing, investment and advisory services to First Nation governments. First Nation borrowing members can access low-rate and long-term loans from the capital markets for community and infrastructure projects by pledging eligible sources of revenue. The regime addresses a persistent barrier to financial governance capacity, revenue generation, and accessing capital that has often impeded the ability of many First Nations to create a functioning economy.

Proposed Enhancements to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act

The mandates of the Tax Commission and Financial Management Board, as prescribed in the FNFMA, are outdated and insufficient to reflect their evolving purposes and activities.

Consequently, the proposed legislative amendments would:

  • Modernize and expand the mandates of the Tax Commission and the Financial Management Board respectively to better reflect the increasing need for their services;
  • Allow the Tax Commission, the Financial Management Board, and the proposed Infrastructure Institute, to take on a limited research and data function to collect, compile, and analyze economic, financial, and commercial data;
  • Update the Board Governance Provisions of the Financial Management Board to change the term of the Chairperson from a part-time to a full-time position and update the remuneration to provide adequate compensation, as well as ensure a strong and diversified Indigenous representation on the Board of Directors;
  • Establish the First Nations Infrastructure Institute as a national Indigenous-led organization that would support First Nations scheduled to the Act, as well as Indigenous entities as defined in s.50.1(1) of the Act to achieve better and more sustainable infrastructure outcomes;
  • Provide First Nations with additional powers to ensure compliance with their laws, including broadening the scope of the existing enforcement provision in paragraph 5(1)(e) of the Act; allowing for reciprocal enforcement measures between land codes and First Nation laws under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management Act and local revenue laws under the FNFMA; and, adding an express ability for First Nations to seek court orders for compliance with local revenue laws and to collect debts through civil actions;
  • Provide that First Nations may make laws respecting services provided by or on behalf of them on reserve lands and may regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in respect of the provision of those services. This includes services in relation to the provision of water, sewer, drainage, waste management, animal control, recreation, transportation, telecommunications and energy;
  • Integrate the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations (FSORR) into the Act;
  • Clarify that only borrowing members with outstanding loans could be called upon to replenish the Debt Reserve Fund, which is a Fund required by the legislation as a safeguard that could be used to pay back investors in the unlikely event that multiple First Nations default on their loans, in circumstances that it had to be used;
  • Reduce the costs of borrowing by combining the two existing Debt Reserve Funds into one. Currently, the Act stipulates that two Debt Reserve Funds must be established: one to protect borrowing with Local Revenues (i.e., property taxes, development cost charges and business activity taxes) and one to protect borrowing with Other Revenues (i.e., most any other revenue of the First Nation, including revenues from leases, businesses, oil and gas revenues etc.). Combining the two funds into one would lead to lower borrowing costs because of the lower overhead costs, and the increase in and diversification of revenue streams, which is attractive to investors.
  • Enable the Financial Management Board and the Tax Commission to conduct their annual meetings in a manner determined by their board of directors, including by electronic participation or entirely by electronic means.

The proposed Bill would contribute to the Government of Canada's objective to work in full partnership with First Nations to continue building nation-to-nation relationships and support self-determination. This will include supporting First Nations communities as they transition to self-government, and support, First Nation-led processes for rebuilding and reconstituting their nations and advancing self-determination.

First Nations Fiscal Management Act

Established in 2006, the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA) is an optional, First Nations-led alternative to the Indian Act that provides First Nations with a legislative and institutional framework through which to assert jurisdiction in the areas of financial management, property taxation, and access to capital markets. With the support of the three First Nation-led institutions established under the Act (the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Finance Authority), the regimehelps First Nations strengthen their financial administration capacity and systems to establish a strong foundation of good governance in their communities.

The First Nations Financial Management Board (the Financial Management Board)

The Financial Management Board is a shared governance institution that assists First Nations in strengthening local financial management regimes. It is also increasingly called upon by the Government of Canada and provincial governments to support First Nations in working towards self-determination and a new fiscal relationship. The Default Management and Prevention Pilot Projects and the 10-Year New Fiscal Relationship Grants are two key successful initiatives that have been in operation for several years (2016 and 2018 respectively), that resulted from joint policy work on a new approach by Indigenous Services Canada, the Assembly of First Nations and the Financial Management Board. The institution is supporting First Nations to build strong governance and financial practices that have resulted in all of the participating First Nations either moving to a lower level of intervention or moving out of default management completely. Similarly, the Financial Management Board's work on the 10-Year Grant is assisting eligible First Nations to access flexible and predictable federal funding to better address their needs and priorities.

The First Nations Tax Commission (the Tax Commission)

The Tax Commission is a shared-governance corporation that administers the property taxation regime under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act. The institution works directly with First Nations to build effective governance capacity, and to implement taxation and expenditure laws based on best practices, common standards, and harmonization with other jurisdictions. Furthermore, the Tax Commission provides First Nations with guidance for consultations with taxpayers and with municipalities, assists communities in resolving disputes, and supports the Minister's powers under section 83 of the Indian Act (money by-laws). The Tax Commission also works with the Tulo Centre for Indigenous Economics, in partnership with the Thompson Rivers University, to develop training programs for First Nation real property tax administrators. The Tulo Centre's mission is to assist First Nations across Canada in building legal and administrative frameworks that support markets on their lands through university-accredited certificate programs, webinars, presentations, and workshops.

The First Nations Finance Authority (the Finance Authority)

The Finance Authority is a not-for-profit institution that allows First Nations to securitize their own-source revenues ("other revenues") and taxation revenues to access long-term, fixed-rate financing. The institution provides First Nations with the same financial instruments and access to capital that other levels of government in Canada have at their disposal to build safe, healthy, and prosperous communities. The Finance Authority is independent of the Government of Canada and is governed by a Board of Directors elected by its borrowing members. The institution obtains capital through the issuance of debentures on the capital markets and lends these proceeds to its borrowing members at fixed rates of interest. Participating First Nations may use the loans to address their infrastructure and socio-economic needs, including the construction of schools, housing, clean energy initiatives, fire halls, roadwork, and a variety of revenue-generating projects.

There has been rapid growth in demand amongst First Nations to join the First Nations Fiscal Management Act in order to access the services of the institutions under the Act. As of March 29, 2023, the regime has achieved the following:

  • 348 First Nations have been scheduled to the Act;
  • 256 First Nations have enacted financial administration laws with support from the Financial Management Board;
  • 210 First Nations have received certification of their financial performances from the Financial Management Board;
  • 133 First Nations have developed and implemented on-reserve property taxation laws with support from the Tax Commission; and,
  • 77 First Nations have accessed over $1.67 billion in financing for infrastructure and economic development through the Finance Authority.

Engagement Process

To support the proposed amendments to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, activities in three distinct phases of engagement and consultation were carried out. The proposed amendments were co-developed with the three First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA) institutions (the First Nations Tax Commission, the First Nations Financial Management Board and the First Nations Finance Authority), and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board. These three institutions are the only First Nations-led institutions with national scope in the areas of fiscal governance and local revenues, and they are widely recognized as experts and leaders in these areas. The proposed amendments are based on feedback that the institutions have received from member First Nations working to take up jurisdiction and building resilient local economies under the Act, as well as their own subject matter expertise in the operation of the regime.

Given the technical nature of past amendments to the Act, consultation and engagement traditionally included the FNFMA institutions who had engaged and incorporated the feedback of the First Nations under the Act. However, given the broad scope of the proposed amendments, as well as the coming into force of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, Canada and the FNFMA institutions worked together to extend the consultation and cooperation opportunities to First Nations scheduled to the Act and other stakeholders. The consultation approach was therefore designed to include three phases.

The first phase involved co-development with the FNFMA institutions and a First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board of the proposed changes to the Act. The second phase of consultation and engagement was planned and carried out in partnership with the institutions and the Development Board and included the First Nations under the Act. Lastly, the third phase of engagement included the National Indigenous Organizations, the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) and Modern Treaty and Self Government Agreement holders.

Canada and the FNFMA institutions have provided information on the proposed amendments, including the establishment of the First Nations Infrastructure Institution on several occasions over the past couple of years, including most recently to First Nations scheduled to the Act at the First Nations Leading the Way Conference, held in Winnipeg, MB on October 4-6, 2022. The proposed amendments were positively received, and Canada and the FNFMA institutions committed to providing more information on the amendments to the scheduled First Nations as soon as it was available.

A consultation draft of the amendments was provided to the institutions for their review in early December 2022. Canada and the institutions held a series of meetings, virtual and in-person, to discuss the amendments and to propose changes to develop further drafts of the amendments from December 2022 to February 2023.

In early 2023, additional consultations and information sharing took place to support the development of the amendments. In January, Canada and the institutions shared a letter to all First Nations scheduled under the Act providing a high-level overview of the proposed changes and a virtual information session was held on January 26, 2023. They were also provided with an email address to which they could send any input directly to Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. First Nations had the opportunity to provide inputs directly to Canada or to the institutions. The January session had participants from 43 First Nations from across the country. Overall, the response was positive and all the questions were in the spirit of gaining a better understanding of the upcoming changes and how individual First Nations could take advantage of the proposed enhancements to the regime. More concretely, participants asked questions to clarify who would be able to benefit from the amendments (e.g. only scheduled First Nations, or Indigenous groups and organizations as well), how (e.g. would First Nations need to amend their existing laws to leverage enhanced enforcement measures) and when (e.g. would some services be available before the Infrastructure Institute is formally established). There were also some specific questions regarding the enhanced enforcement mechanisms, existing reporting requirements, the new data collection for institutions, and more technical elements, such as the combining of the debt reserve fund.

Who benefits from the amendments?

In response to these main questions, the First Nations Financial Management Board, the First Nations Tax Commission, and the First Nations Infrastructure Institute would be empowered to provide many of their services to non-scheduled entities, including interested treaty and self-governing First Nations, as well as other Indigenous groups and organizations upon request. This would include Inuit and Métis communities and Indigenous organizations should they wish to receive these services. First Nations will continue to be the only groups who can take advantage of the Act's law-making powers in the areas of local revenues, financial management, access to capital, and services.

Canada is also working with the First Nations Fiscal Management Act institutions, the Province of British Columbia, and interested self-governing First Nations on regulations to amend the Act to enable self-governing First Nations and Indigenous organizations, including Métis and Inuit governments, to benefit from the pooled borrowing regime. Similar work is underway for Indigenous not-for-profit organizations.

How would First Nations need to amend their existing laws?

In terms of the enforcement provisions, First Nations would need to assess the content of their own laws to determine whether amendments would be necessary in order to exercise these new compliance and enforcement powers.

When would FNII services become available?

The First Nations Infrastructure Institute Development Board is already working with interested Indigenous groups and communities to develop infrastructure capacity, standards, and best practices. The Development Board's support has been crucial in several ongoing proof of concept demonstration projects and interested communities are invited to contact the Development Board to explore their services.

At the end of January, additional letters were sent to National Indigenous Organizations (the Assembly of First Nations, the Métis National Council and Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami), the Manitoba Métis Federation and Modern Treaty and Self Government Agreement holders providing a high-level overview of the proposed changes to the Act and a virtual information session was held on February 21, 2023.

Key Elements

Proposed Enhancements to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act

The proposed legislative amendments would:

  • Expand and Modernize the First Nations Tax Commission's Mandate: Since the Tax Commission's mandate was originally developed, its activities under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act (FNFMA) have evolved to support First Nations seeking to create local revenue laws beyond real property taxation, such as service fees, development cost charges, and business activity taxes. The Tax Commission also plays a broader role in developing approaches to grow First Nation economies and increase their local revenues. The proposed amendments would strengthen the education and capacity supports available to clients. Finally, the institution's current mandate limits it to provide services to First Nations scheduled to the Act; however, requests for its advice and services now include Self-Governing First Nations, municipalities, and other orders of governments. The proposed amendments to update the Tax Commission's mandate would reflect the growing need for their services and allow them to better respond to the increased demand, including to these new groups.
  • Expand and Modernize the First Nations Financial Management Board's Mandate: The Financial Management Board is increasingly sought out as an accredited institution for standards development and to provide financial management assistance to First Nation governments and organizations. Since 2016, the institution has received proposal-based funding from Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) to demonstrate the effectiveness of an alternative capacity building approach to resolving default management, through Default Management Prevention Pilot projects, to support First Nations in third-party management to establish strong governance and financial practices. Since 2018, the Financial Management Board has also been funded by ISC to support First Nations seeking access to 10-year grants. Both of these initiatives have demonstrated consistent and significant levels of success for First Nations with varying levels of capacity. The proposed amendments would expand the mandate of the Financial Management Board to permanently include these responsibilities in order to stabilize its operations and ensure that First Nations continue to have access to these capacity development services on an ongoing basis. The proposed amendments would also complete the 2018 expansion of its services and certification standards for new client segments, including Tribal Councils and Self-Governing First Nations and Treaty groups, as well as enable the Financial Management Board to provide monitoring and reviewing services.
  • Update the Board Governance Provisions of the First Nations Financial Management Board: As a working Board of Directors, with significant evolution of responsibilities, the responsibilities of the Financial Management Board Chairperson have increased to a full-time position and therefore the proposed amendment would change the position of the Chairperson of the Financial Management Board from a part-time to a full-time position to provide adequate compensation. This is in alignment with the responsibilities of the Chief Commissioner of the First Nations Tax Commission, which is already a full-time position. The provisions would also be updated to ensure a strong and diversified Indigenous representation on the Board of Directors.
  • New First Nation Law Making Power respecting the provision of services: The proposed amendments would allow First Nations to make laws respecting the provision of services provided on reserve lands by or on behalf of First Nations and to regulate, prohibit and impose requirements in respect of those services. These services could include water, sewer, drainage, waste management, animal control, recreation, transportation, telecommunications and energy, as well as any other similar services. First Nations have similar bylaw making powers under the Indian Act; however, bringing this power under the FNFMA would enable First Nations to take on this jurisdiction while moving out from under another area of the Indian Act. To simplify the process, these laws would not be subject to approval by the institutions. For further clarity, these laws would not be 'local revenue laws' or 'laws respecting financial administration' within the meaning of the Act – and therefore the approval requirements that otherwise apply to local revenue laws and financial administration laws would not apply to these laws regulating the provision of services on reserve lands.
  • Enforcement: The proposed amendments seek to provide First Nations with additional powers to ensure compliance with their laws. These amendments include: broadening the scope of the existing enforcement provision in paragraph 5(1)(e) of the Act; allowing for reciprocal enforcement measures between land codes and First Nation laws under the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management and local revenue laws under the FNFMA; and, adding an express ability for First Nations to seek court orders for compliance with local revenue laws and to collect debts through civil actions.
  • Data Collection: The proposed amendments seek to allow the Tax Commission, the Financial Management Board, and the proposed Infrastructure Institute, to take on a limited data function. This would allow the institutions to monitor growth and enhance their capacity to support evidence-based planning and decision-making on fiscal and economic objectives within the scope of their purposes by collecting, compiling, and analyzing economic, financial, and commercial data.
  • Lifting the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations into the Act: The proposed amendments seek to integrate the content of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations (FSORR) into the Act. The FNFMA was originally designed to enable the leveraging of local or tax revenues through pooled borrowing. In 2011, the Act was expanded through regulations to enable the use of other types of revenues to secure loans through the Finance Authority. With this change, there has been a significant increase in First Nations accessing capital through the regime, with borrowing amount to more than $1.67 billion to date. However, the institutions have raised concerns that enabling the use of other revenues through the FSORR increases the risk of inconsistencies between the Act and regulations, and is unnecessarily complex; the amendments proposed to incorporate this text into the Act would eliminate this risk of inconsistencies. The proposed changes would also include further updates to the Act to enable the use of the First Nations Goods and Services Tax (FNGST) for pooled borrowing in certain circumstances.
  • Combine the existing funds into a single Debt Reserve Fund and clarify its operation: The proposed amendments seek to combine the fund supported by Other Revenues with the fund supported by Local Revenues. They also clarify that only borrowing members with outstanding loans could be called upon to replenish the fund in circumstances that it had to be used. The Finance Authority withholds 5% of each First Nation loan and deposits it into a Debt Reserve Fund (DRF), which it can draw upon to cover any missed payments should a community default. The Fund is a critical safeguard for the Finance Authority's investment-grade credit rating and is essential for maintaining lower interest rates for its borrowing members. The current language of subsection 84(5) of the Act (liability for shortfall) could be misinterpreted to imply that, should the Debt Reserve Fund become depleted, the Finance Authority could require all present and past borrowing members to replenish the Fund, even if they have fully paid back their loan, although this was not the intention of the legislation.
  • Virtual Meetings: At present, section 131 of the Act implies that the annual meetings of the Financial Management Board and the Tax Commission must be held at a physical location. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that virtual meetings are essential for keeping Canadians safe. Consequently, the proposed amendments would enable the Financial Management Board and the Tax Commission to conduct their annual meetings in a manner determined by their Board of Directors, including by electronic participation or entirely by electronic means.

Establishment of a First Nations Infrastructure Institute

Building on the success of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, the proposed amendments also seek to establish a First Nations Infrastructure Institute (the Infrastructure Institute) under the regime. The Infrastructure Institute's services would be optional, like the services of the other institutions under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act. This Indigenous-led institution would support communities' efforts to achieve better and more sustainable infrastructure outcomes for their people, as well as partner with, and complement regional Indigenous infrastructure delivery organizations. This proposed institution would be a center of infrastructure excellence, information, research and innovation, for which participation would be voluntary. The new institute would develop standards, tools, processes and best practices adapted to the Indigenous context to implement and manage sustainable infrastructure, and assist its clients with all aspects of their infrastructure project planning, procurement, implementation, operation and maintenance. These services would be available to all First Nations, including those with self-governing and modern treaty agreements, as well as First Nation organizations and other Indigenous groups as defined in s.50.1(1) of the FNFMA. The Infrastructure Institute would also support interested First Nations governments scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act in establishing regulatory frameworks respecting the provision of services on reserves, including infrastructure used in the provision of those services. This support would include standards development, sample regulatory law development, and a law review service upon request.

By ensuring that First Nations have access to infrastructure-specific capacity services, supports, and related tools, the Infrastructure Institute would help to reduce federal costs of infrastructure investments through more sustainable infrastructure systems and competitive procurement approaches. The Infrastructure Institute would also assist interested clients with the development of financial options for the recovery of the operational, maintenance, and replacement costs, where possible, which would help communities generate new revenues, increase their access to capital, and lessen the dependence on federal infrastructure programs.  Over the long term, the Infrastructure Institute would provide Canada, First Nation communities, the private sector, financial institutions and even insurers, with an holistic and orderly risk mitigation and jurisdiction transfer framework.

First Nations Infrastructure Institute

Gaps related to infrastructure

Building on the success of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, the proposed amendments seek to establish a First Nations Infrastructure Institute (the Infrastructure Institute) under the Act. The concept of a First Nations Infrastructure Institute was proposed by the First Nations Tax Commission to help address enduring gaps related to infrastructure capacity, institutional supports and regulatory powers, which result in First Nation infrastructure taking longer to develop, costing more to build and having a shorter lifespan.

While significant investments are being made in infrastructure and First Nations operating under the Act have successfully leveraged more than $1.67 billion in capital from global markets for investments in infrastructure and economic development through the First Nations Finance Authority, the regime currently does not have an institution with expertise specifically in the area of infrastructure to support communities. In particular, there is an urgent need for an institution that can support First Nations capacity in developing more complex infrastructure projects, such as water and wastewater systems.

There is also a need for additional regulatory powers to complement fiscal powers already available under the Act and support the long-term sustainability of public infrastructure on reserve lands. While the Act provides communities with the power to charge fees for services provided on reserve by or on behalf of First Nations, it lacks the matching law-making power to regulate the provision of those services that other local governments have. This regulatory power is needed for more sustainable infrastructure, as regulations set out the rules of access and requirements to connect to these systems safely.

Proposed Services

An interim First Nations-led Development Board and a Technical Working Group was established to scope out the service offering of a First Nations Infrastructure Institute and to advance the organizational design through engagement with local, regional and national stakeholders.

Proof-of-concept demonstration projects with the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point, Sts'ailes and Paq'tnkek First Nations, the Atlantic First Nations Water Authority and the First Nations Health Authority helped identify different service requirements and informed the development of processes, procedures and standards and organizational design to complement and support the infrastructure service transfers to Indigenous organizations. Work to date includes collaboration on procurement policies; utility planning, procurement, bundling; financing and funding options; and, tools for costs recovery to support infrastructure projects that serve member, non-member resident and socio-economic development. More specifically, FNII is working with the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point to support the development of the feasibility study, the business case and procurement options for a water / wastewater asset, and the development of a financial model that incorporates First Nations Fiscal Management Act tools that can be used for costs recovery to support treatment process (wastewater and water) and linear infrastructure projects that serve member, non-member resident and economic development projects.

As a result of this engagement, demonstration pilots, and institutional development work, the Infrastructure Institute would be enabled to offer infrastructure-specific capacity building, knowledge transfer, technical and advisory support, and certification and monitoring services.  The Infrastructure Institute's services would be optional, like the services of the other institutions under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act.

Proposed service offerings would be two fold:

  • First, the Infrastructure Institute would be able to assist its clients with all aspects of their infrastructure project planning, implementation and ongoing management, as well as the development of fiscal options for the recovery of their operation, maintenance and replacement costs. These services would be available to all First Nations, including those with Self-Governing and Modern Treaty agreements, as well as First Nations organizations supporting community infrastructure, such as Tribal Councils and regional service delivery aggregates. As eligibility for these types of service offerings would not be limited to those scheduled to the Act, the Infrastructure Institute could also support Métis and Inuit clients should that be of interest to them. The level of support and type of service provided by the Infrastructure Institute would be adapted to the needs and capacity of each client.
  • Second, the Infrastructure Institute would support interested First Nations scheduled to the First Nations Fiscal Management Act to establish regulatory frameworks respecting the provision of services on reserves, including infrastructure used in the delivery of those services. This would include standards development, sample regulatory law development, and a law review service upon request.

The Infrastructure Institute's proposed approach is focused on improving First Nation infrastructure outcomes through the use of standards and industry best practices at all stages of the infrastructure life-cycle. The Infrastructure Institute would provide the skills, technical support and processes necessary to ensure that First Nations and Indigenous organizations efficiently and effectively plan, develop, procure, implement, own, manage, and operate and maintain infrastructure assets on their land.

The Infrastructure Institute would not fund projects, provide engineering or architectural services, act as a contractor, builder or operator, or make any decision with respect to infrastructure projects.

The Infrastructure Institute would support and work in collaboration with regional infrastructure organizations, including tribal councils and service delivery aggregates (e.g. the First Nations Atlantic Water Authority), with a view to complement the suite of services that they offer to communities.

Next Steps

Establishment of the First Nations Infrastructure Institute

Provided that the Bill is adopted by Parliament, upon the coming into force of the legislative amendments, a Board of Directors (9 directors and a Chairperson) would be appointed by the Governor in Council. The Board of Directors would be composed of individuals from across Canada, including members of First Nations, who are committed to improving infrastructure outcomes for First Nations and Indigenous entities and who have the experience or capacity to enable the Institute to fulfill its mandate. Appointments will be recommended to Cabinet by the Minister following open, transparent, and merit-based selection processes. Once approved by Cabinet, the Governor General will sign Orders in Council to formalize the appointments. The Orders in Council normally specify the appointment authority, the tenure and the length of the terms of the appointments. All Orders in Council for Governor in Council appointments are available in the online Orders in Council database. The Government is also striving for gender parity, and seeks to ensure that Indigenous peoples and minority groups are properly represented in positions of leadership. Recruitment strategies seek to attract qualified candidates who reflect Canada's diversity in terms of linguistic capacity, regional representation; and diversity (women, Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, and members of visible minority and ethnic/cultural groups).

Once Directors have been appointed, the Board would establish a head office and work on the approval of strategic priorities, a five-year corporate plan and a budget to support the Infrastructure Institute's full ramp-up and longer-term operations within a 12-month period.

Provided that the Bill is adopted by Parliament, the Government will start working together with the First Nations Infrastructure Institute to co-develop an approach for ongoing and sustainable funding.   

Regulatory amendments

Provided that the Bill is adopted by Parliament, and once the proposed provisions of the Financing Secured by Other Revenues Regulations have been integrated into the Act, these regulations will need to be repealed. This could proceed as part of a larger package of amendments to the regulations of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act.

This package could include regulatory amendments that have been developed, in collaboration with the institutions under the Act, to the Debt Reserve Fund Replenishment Regulations, the Revenue Management Implementation Regulations, the First Nations Taxation Enforcement Regulations, the First Nations Assessment Appeal Regulations, and minor amendments to several other regulations, e.g., to update the name of the Act to its current title, update the address of one of the institutions, and capitalize the expression 'First Nation', in line with current drafting standards.

First Nations Goods and Services Tax

First Nations wishing to use their First Nations Goods and Services Tax revenues as security for loans from the First Nations Finance Authority will need to work with Finance Canada to update their tax agreements to specifically permit such a use. Finance Canada has indicated that they stand ready to update the agreements on request to do so by the First Nations.

Enforcement of First Nations laws

Given the shared jurisdiction over the administration of justice, addressing issues related to the enforcement and prosecutions of First Nations laws and by-laws – including laws enacted by First Nations under the First Nations Fiscal Management Act – requires collaboration with First Nations, provincial and territorial partners, as well as amongst federal stakeholders. The Government of Canada is involved in a number of tripartite discussions with Indigenous communities and partners and provincial representatives to identify solutions to the lack of enforcement and prosecutions of First Nations laws and by-laws. The Government of Canada will continue to explore potential initiatives and measures, in consultation with Indigenous, federal, provincial and territorial partners, with a view to strengthening the federal response to the lack of enforcement and prosecutions of First Nations laws and by-laws.

Expansion of Act to include Modern Treaty and Self-Governing First Nations

Adaptation regulations, permitted by section 141 of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, are being actively co-developed with First Nations partners and other stakeholders, including the Province of British Columbia, to provide an opt-in method for Modern Treaty and Self-Governing First Nations to participate in pooled borrowing under the Act. Consultations on draft regulations are anticipated in 2023. 

Expansion of Act to Include Indigenous Not-for-Profits

Policy work regarding adaptation regulations via section 141.1 of the First Nations Fiscal Management Act is underway to provide an optional avenue for Indigenous not-for-profits to participate in pooled borrowing under the Act. Consultations on draft regulations are anticipated at a later date. 

Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

You will not receive a reply. Don't include personal information (telephone, email, SIN, financial, medical, or work details).
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: