Appearance before the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs: Bill C-15, An Act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, April 20, 2021

Romeo Saganash, as an individual

• Said that there is no State that has expressed opposition to the UN Declaration
• Spoke to the differences between Bill C-15 and Bill C-262, noting in some ways Bill C-15 goes further than Bill C-262.
• Spoke to the significance of the preamble: that the doctrines of superiority are condemned as racist and legally invalid; that all forms of colonialism are rejected and the government is committed to reconciliation based on the principles of justice, equality, and respect for human rights; that there is an urgent need to promote and respect the inherent rights of Indigenous peoples, and; that Indigenous peoples have an inherent right to self-governance.
• Identified some issues with the bill: differences between the French and English, and that clause 4 needs to be amended to read that the purposes of this Act are A) and B).

Indigenous Research Network (IRN)

• Expressed a desire for the IRN to participate in the action plan
• Noted that uncertainty from Bill C-15, e.g., FPIC, was making it more difficult for investors to engage with Indigenous communities.

Prof. Sheryl Lightfoot and Prof. Brenda Gunn, as individuals

• Both, individually, expressed support for Bill C-15

Congress of Aboriginal Peoples (CAP)

• Expressed support for the Declaration
• Expressed concern that Bill C-15 leaves out non-status, off-reserve Indigenous peoples

National Coalition of Chiefs

• Voiced concerns with Bill C-15, believing that the bill is unclear and will deter future investment in Indigenous communities, specifically around natural resource development projects. He specifically focused on the concept of FPIC, questioning who gives consent, and whether this would amount to a veto in practice, adding uncertainty to projects.

BC First Nations Leadership Council

• Supportive of Bill C-15, and viewed its implementation as a strong foundation to move forward on improving and negotiating both old and new treaties in BC.

First Nations Financial Management Board

• Noted that due to the short notice of his appearance, a written brief was produced by the Board and would be submitted to the committee. He believed that the best way to change the current status quo was to recognize that changes needs to occur, and to begin earnest discussions about how to improve things; that there needed to be a recognition that Indigenous peoples have a place in the Canadian economy. He spoke to the recent Clearwater transaction in Atlantic Canada as an example of the opportunities that exist when Indigenous communities have rights, title, and the ability to engage in development. He views Bill C-15 as beginning the conversation to reach clarity over issues, such as duty to consult, that have lacked clarity over the last 10 years.

Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee)

• Focused his remarks on FPIC, stating that the notion of veto is not in his vocabulary when dealing with projects, nor does it exist in the Declaration or Bill C-15.
• Views Bill C-15 and the Declaration as ending unilateral decision making.

Land Claims Agreements Coalition

• Spoke to the need to give primacy of article 37(1) and (2), the recognition of rights and treaties, in order to ensure the rights of modern treaties are upheld.

Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador

• Supports the Declaration and efforts to implement it, but does not support Bill C-15 in its current form as is needs to go much further, but have to support it under duress.
• Identified amendments, including: amending section 2.2 to specifically state that the Declaration should be used to interpret section 35 of the Constitution; that the non-derogation clause should be removed; that the body of the bill should include the repudiation of the doctrines of superiorities, and; that the Declaration should be considered in any legal ruling involves the rights of Indigenous peoples.

First Nations Major Projects Coalition

• Noted the importance of revenue streams in order to further advance Indigenous self-governance, reconciliation, and to achieve the future envisaged by the Declaration
• Noted the need to create self-sustaining Indigenous governance structures; furthering a new Nation-to-Nation partnership; and advocated for direct First Nations involvement in economic development through mechanisms like equity ownership of projects.

Mining Association of Canada

• Expressed support for incremental implementation of the Declaration.
• Noted concerns that without adequate resourcing, training of federal officials, and co-development with Indigenous and industry stakeholders, Bill C-15 could ultimately create more uncertainty for the sector and make projects more difficult to undertake.
• Wants clarity on whether the Declaration is legally binding and how FPIC is defined.

Indian Resource Council (IRC)

• Expressed support for the UN Declaration, but also concern for unintended consequences of Bill C-15, namely the slowing down or blocking of economic development projects, if uncertainty was increased
• Noted specific concerns around the definition of consent and who can provide it; whether it was a veto or not, and; special interest groups "weaponizing" Bill C-15 to stop resource projects they do not support.

Paul Joffe, lawyer, as an individual

• Similar to Romeo Saganash he said: "Free" meant no coercion or manipulation; "Prior" meant obtained in advance; and, "Informed" meant that information is not withheld and that it is adequate. Without these, "Consent" could not be given. He echoed calls for racism to be added to the preamble and action plan.

Amnistie Internationale Canada francophone

• Spoke to the organization's support of both Bill C-262 and Bill C-15.

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)

• Noted they fully support implementation of the Declaration in Canada that is consistent with the Constitution and Canadian law
• Expressed concern that Bill C-15 would increase uncertainty, and that as a result new projects would be limited and investments would be harder to attract.
• Recommended clarifying whether Bill C-15 means automatic application in domestic law; defining FPIC; ensuring the action plan is the main vehicle to make the Declaration actionable in Canada; ensuring the action plan is co-developed, and; that the action plan is adequately resourced and contains clear accountabilities.

Q. What is the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?

A. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is a comprehensive international human rights instrument on the rights of Indigenous peoples around the world. Through 46 articles, it affirms and sets out a broad range of collective and individual rights that constitute the minimum standards to protect the rights of Indigenous peoples and to contribute to their survival, dignity and well-being.

These include rights relating to:

• Self-determination and self-government
• Equality and non-discrimination
• Culture and language
• Identity
• Religion and spirituality
• Lands, territories and resources
• Environment
• Indigenous institutions and legal systems
• Health
• Education
• Community

The Declaration is the result of almost 25 years of work and collaboration between UN member states and Indigenous peoples from around the world. Indigenous leaders from Canada played a significant role in its development, including the drafting and negotiating.

In 2007, a majority of member states adopted the Declaration at the United Nations General Assembly. In 2016, the Government of Canada endorsed the Declaration without qualification and committed to its full and effective implementation.

Q. Do UN member states have to implement the Declaration?

A. How a country chooses to respect and implement the rights described in the Declaration will depend on each country's unique circumstances. Countries have a number of tools available to them to ensure that international human rights instruments and standards are reflected domestically. These include policies, directives, institutional processes and mechanisms, and legislation.

Consistent with the UN Charter, countries around the world have a duty to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights. The Declaration reaffirms that Indigenous peoples, both collectively and individually, enjoy all rights already recognized at the international level.

In Canada, international human rights standards are reflected in a range of processes, policies and legislation. In addition to the human rights protections provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights codes, our Constitution recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of Indigenous peoples.

The Government of Canada believes that a legislative framework for implementing the Declaration federally would build on this recognition. This approach is consistent with the Declaration itself, which calls on States to collaborate with Indigenous peoples on appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the objectives it sets out (Article 38).

Q. If section 35 of the Canadian Constitution already recognizes and affirms Aboriginal and treaty rights, why do we need to implement the Declaration?

A. Section 35 of the Constitution recognizes and affirms the rights of Indigenous peoples, including those set out in treaties signed with the Crown. Reconciliation with First Nations, Inuit and Métis is the fundamental purpose of section 35.

However, we have seen that constitutional provisions alone are not enough — we need to breathe life into them through action and commitment to the values they embody. We need to focus on achieving reconciliation and the recognition of rights outside litigation, which is by its nature an adversarial process. The Declaration can help us do this work with rights holders and others to ensure that Canadian laws protect and promote the rights of Indigenous peoples, consistent with the Declaration and section 35. Bill C-15 would provide a framework for the Government of Canada to implement the rights affirmed by the Declaration.

Q. How can Industry contribute to the implementation of the UN Declaration and Bill C-15?

A. Many industry sectors have already taken steps to embrace the Declaration in the context of their work with Indigenous peoples in Canada and elsewhere. This experience has lessons and best practices that we hope can provide important and useful input to federal efforts to implement the Declaration.

While C-15 does not include reference to a formal role for other stakeholders, including industry, in the development of this action plan, there will no doubt be opportunities to contribute. In particular, should the action plan lead to legislative or policy changes that are of interest to the natural resources sector, such changes would be subject to usual parliamentary and policy development processes, which would include opportunities for engagement.

Q. What actions have been taken since 2016 to implement the Declaration or reflect its principles in laws?

Elements of the Declaration are already reflected in a range of Canadian laws, policies and programs, for example, section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, the equality rights provisions of the Charter and the non-discrimination protections provided by the Canadian Human Rights Act. Since 2016, the Government of Canada has taken a range of important measures that contribute to renewed, respectful Crown-Indigenous relationships that align with both section 35 of our Constitution and the Declaration.

As of April 2020, there are nine federal laws that refer to the Declaration:

• An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (preamble and s.8)
• An Act to amend the Indian Act in response to the Superior Court of Quebec decision in Descheneaux c. Canada (Procureur général) (subsection 11(2) under "Consultations and Reports")
• Canadian Energy Regulator Act (preamble)
• Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Act
• Department of Indigenous Services Act (preamble)
• Department for Women and Gender Equality Act (preamble)
• First Nations Land Management Act (preamble)
• Indigenous Languages Act (preamble and section 5)
• Impact Assessment Act (preamble)

In addition, the Government of Canada has developed or updated policies and guidance to be consistent with the Declaration and Canada's constitutional framework. These policies assist federal officials' work whenever it involves Indigenous peoples and help to contribute to the implementation of the Declaration. Some examples are:

• Principles Respecting the Government of Canada's Relationship with Indigenous Peoples
• The Attorney General's Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples
• Jordan's Principle, which helps First Nations children living in Canada access the products, services and supports they need
• New First Nations education policy that respects the principle of First Nations control of First Nations education
• The 2019 Recognition and Reconciliation of Rights Policy for treaty negotiations in British Columbia

We also continue to work on developing, updating and improving policies to ensure that negotiations with Indigenous peoples are conducted in a manner consistent with our commitment to reconciliation. These updates will better align with the rights-based approaches we are currently using at discussion tables and with what we have learned from Indigenous partners.

The Government of Canada is also engaged in discussions with Indigenous partners at over 150 discussion tables across the country to explore new ways of working together to advance the recognition of Indigenous rights and self-determination. These discussions involve more than 500 Indigenous communities, with a total population of nearly one million people.

Q. What changes are contemplated to the machinery of government to effectively implement Bill C-15?

A. When Bill C-15 receives Royal Assent and comes into force, the Government of Canada will work in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples to begin the preparation of the action plan and take measures to ensure that federal laws are consistent with the UN Declaration.

When Bill C-15 is passed, all federal departments will have important roles to play in implementing the legislation. As the Government of Canada considers the development of the action plan and the measures needed to ensure our laws are consistent with the Declaration in collaboration with Indigenous peoples, we expect some of the discussions will include identifying new, innovative processes and creative ways of working together. Strengthened partnerships will enhance our collective capacity to effectively implement Bill C-15 and ultimately, achieve reconciliation.

Q. When did the Government engage on this legislation and with whom?

A. Between June and November 2020, the Government of Canada met bilaterally with the Assembly of First Nations, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, and the Métis National Council to advance concrete amendments to PMB C-262. Thirty-three (33) sessions were held.

Between October and November 2020, the Government of Canada held 28 sessions with modern treaty and self-governing rights holders on a nation-to-nation, government-to-government basis as reflected in their agreements. We also met with other national and regional organizations as well as Indigenous women's organizations and LGBTQ2S+ groups. A special virtual engagement session was held for Indigenous youth and Indigenous law students.

Between October and November 2020, the Government of Canada also held four discussion sessions with key industry sectors: minerals & metals, clean energy, forestry, and petroleum sectors. During this time, we also held four discussion sessions with provincial and territorial governments, two with Ministers and two with Deputy Ministers.

The Government of Canada also received over 50 written submissions of feedback and proposed text changes, including views and recommendations on the development of an action plan.

Q. Why was former Private Member's Bill C-262 the basis or starting point for this new legislation? Why not start from scratch?

A. In 2016, the Government of Canada fully endorsed the Declaration without qualification and committed to its full and effective implementation. The Government then supported former Private Member's Bill C-262; however, the Senate did not pass the Bill before the Parliamentary session concluded in June 2019. At that time, the Government committed to introducing similar legislation as a Government bill, indicating that PMB C-262 would be the floor for future legislation.

By using former PMB C-262, we built on the momentum and support from Indigenous partners generated as former PMB C-262 moved through Parliament. Not only did this provide a starting point for engagement, but it has resulted in a process for improving the legislative framework for the implementation of the Declaration.

Q. What did engagement focus on?

A. Engagement focused on potential enhancements to a consultation draft of the legislation, which was based on former Private Members Bill C-262. A consultation draft was shared during the engagement sessions in order to seek feedback to improve and amend the draft.

Q. What did you learn during the engagement sessions?

A. During engagement sessions, participants offered a diversity of perspectives and recommendations that helped shape the development of the legislative proposal. For example, we received input that:

• we should strengthen the language used in the preamble and clarify the purpose of the legislation, and the scope and process of aligning the laws of Canada with the Declaration; we clearly learned the importance of including a reference to marginalized groups, such as Indigenous women, gender-diverse and two-spirit people, as well as climate change and sustainable development; and
• we learned it was critical to acknowledge the role of the Declaration as a framework for reconciliation, justice, healing and peace, and for addressing systemic racism and discrimination. Others referenced the importance of educating Canadians to ensure that Indigenous rights are understood and valued; in addition, participants reminded us that the recognition of the right to self-determination and self-government is vital, and that the need for a strong distinctions-based approach throughout the legislation is essential; and
• modern treaty partners emphasized the importance of respecting Article 37, which outlines respect of treaty rights, self-government agreements and other constructive arrangements. Similarly, we learned from many that the proposed federal legislation should not interfere with work underway at regional and provincial levels.

With respect to the action plan, almost everyone emphasized the importance of further collaboration on its development, as well as specific timelines for its completion. With respect to goals, we learned the plan should address gaps in education, employment, housing, food security, health and well-being, child welfare and safety, all of which contribute to the inequalities faced by many Indigenous peoples.

The What We Learned Report is now publicly available on Justice Canada's website, it outlines in greater detail the input we received during engagement sessions, which helped shape this Bill.

Q. What did the Government of Canada hear from Industry and is it reflected in the Bill?

A. Between October and November 2020, the Government of Canada held four roundtable sessions with key industry sectors.

These sector-specific sessions brought together the National representatives of the Indigenous peoples and Nations, industry representatives from the minerals and metals, clean energy, forest, and petroleum sectors, many of whom are already actively putting plans in place related to the Declaration.

The What We Learned Report is now publicly available on Justice Canada's website, it outlines in greater detail the input we received during engagement sessions, which helped shape this Bill.

Q. Why was the engagement period not longer to allow for engagement that was more meaningful?

A. In 2019, the Government of Canada committed to introducing legislation by the end of 2020 to implement the Declaration. The Government also committed to build on the notable support for former Private Member's Bill C-262, which was thoroughly studied in the previous Parliament. The COVID-19 pandemic also impacted our timelines for engagement. Recognizing that our process was not perfect, but also hearing from many Indigenous partners the sense of urgency that this legislation be introduced, the Government of Canada felt it was important to meet our mandate commitment to introduce by December 2020.

Q. Will you post a "What We Learned Report" or make the engagement summary public?

A. Yes. The What We Learned Report is now publicly available on Justice Canada's website.

Q. What is the purpose of Bill C-15? Why does Canada need legislation?

A. The purpose of the legislation is to affirm the Declaration as a universal, international human rights instrument with application in Canadian law and to provide a framework for the Government of Canada's implementation of the Declaration.

This framework would establish new accountability for the Government of Canada to work with First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples to find new ways to protect, promote and uphold the human rights of Indigenous peoples in Canada, now and into the future. It would also bring clarity regarding the path forward for Indigenous peoples, communities, industry and all Canadians. A legislative framework would also further demonstrate the Government of Canada's continued commitment to uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples now and in the future.

In this way, this Bill can also ensure the Declaration helps guide the reconciliation process as it relates to Canada's legislative and policy processes. It would ensure that, moving forward, the laws of Canada reflect the standards set out in the Declaration, while also respecting Aboriginal and Treaty rights recognized and affirmed in the Constitution.

This legislation responds to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Call to Action 43, which calls on all levels of government to fully adopt and implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoplesas the framework for reconciliation. It also responds to the Missing and Murdered Indigenous and Women's Inquiry Calls for Justice.

Q. What would the legislation do once passed by Parliament?

A. Once passed by Parliament, the legislation would create new requirements for the Government of Canada. It would require the Government of Canada, in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples, to:

• take all measures necessary to ensure that the laws of Canada are consistent with the Declaration, and
• prepare and implement an action plan to achieve the objectives of the Declaration.

Moving forward, the laws of Canada would be required to reflect the standards set out in the Declaration, while also respecting Aboriginal and Treaty rights recognized and affirmed in the Constitution. The legislation would require the Government of Canada to report annually to Parliament on progress made to align the laws of Canada with the Declaration and on the development and implementation of the action plan.

This approach is consistent with the Declaration itself, which calls on states to collaborate with Indigenous peoples on appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the goals set out in the Declaration (Article 38).

Q. How would the action plan be developed?

A. When Bill C-15 receives Royal Assent and comes into force, the Government of Canada would begin to prepare the action plan in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples. Bill C-15 requires that the action plan be tabled in Parliament as soon as possible and no later than three years after the Bill is passed. The action plan can then be renewed and updated as needed.

Q. What types of measures would the action plan include?

A. As written, the proposed legislation would require the action plan to include measures:

• to address injustices, combat prejudice and eliminate all forms of violence and discrimination against Indigenous peoples, including elders, youth, children, persons with disabilities, women, men, gender-diverse and two-spirit persons
• to promote mutual respect and understanding, as well as good relations, including through human rights education
• related to monitoring, follow-up, recourse, remedy, oversight or accountability with respect to the implementation of the Declaration

The action plan would also include measures for monitoring the implementation of the plan itself and for reviewing and amending the plan.

Q. Why is the timeline associated to the action plan 3 years? That seems too long.

A. While we understand the need to press forward expeditiously, we also need to be realistic about the time it will take to work in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples from coast to coast to coast. It is important to note that the provision requires the development of the action plan as soon as practicable. The 3-year timeline was only intended as the maximum amount of time available. However, we remain open to hearing about whether the timeframe for an initial action plan should be shorter, while still ensuring a sufficiently cooperative process.

Q. Would the action plan be made public?

A. Bill C-15 would require the Government of Canada to table the action plan upon completion in each House of Parliament. Following this step, the Bill requires the plan to be made public.

Q. The purpose statement in clause 4 of Bill C-15 affirms the "Declaration" as a human rights instrument with application in Canadian law. Does that mean all laws of Canada or just federal laws? If the Declaration already has application in Canadian law, what changes do you anticipate to existing laws of Canada in the future?

A. Bill C-15 includes a purpose clause to address the application of the Declaration in Canadian law and to affirm the legislation as a framework for federal implementation of the Declaration. As used in Bill C-15, the expression "Laws of Canada" is aimed at federal legislation passed by the Parliament of Canada.

With respect to anticipated changes to existing federal laws, this will be a collaborative process with Indigenous peoples and others to assess where changes to laws, policies and practices may be needed to better reflect the objectives of the Declaration. We expect this process to occur over time, and any future changes to federal law would be undertaken in cooperation with Indigenous peoples and go through regular policy development, engagement and parliamentary processes.

The purpose clause also recognizes that the Declaration has "application in Canadian law". This means that the Declaration can be used to interpret and apply Canadian law, just like other international human rights instruments. In fact, the Declaration is already being used in this way. Bill C-15 is intended to recognize and affirm this role, without turning the Declaration itself into a "Canadian law", which could create a lot of confusion and legal challenges.

Q. Would the legislation have the effect of making the whole text of the Declaration legally binding in Canadian domestic law?

A. If passed, the legislation would not give the Declaration direct legal effect in Canada beyond its existing role as a source for interpreting Canadian laws. Rather, it would affirm the Government of Canada's commitment to sustained efforts and new processes to align laws with the Declaration over time. This is how the Declaration would be implemented federally going forward.

The Declaration recognizes that the situation of Indigenous peoples varies from region to region and from country to country, and that implementation of the rights it describes must respond to the specific and unique circumstances in each country, including Canada. As such, it provides flexibility to ensure rights are recognized, protected and implemented in a manner that reflects domestic circumstances, in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples.

Q. How does the proposed legislation compare to former Private Members Bill (PMB) C-262?

A. Following discussions with our Indigenous partners, the Government of Canada used PMB C-262 as the floor for a new legislative proposal. Like PMB C-262, the new legislation includes a preamble, measures that would require the Government of Canada, in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples, to align federal laws and the Declaration and develop an action plan, and report to Parliament on progress.

Areas where this Bill differs from PMB C-262 include the addition of:

• new language in the preamble, including to:
  • highlight the positive contributions the Declaration can make to reconciliation, healing and peace as well as harmonious and cooperative relations in Canada;
  • recognize the inherent rights of Indigenous peoples;
  • reflect the importance of respecting treaties and agreements;
  • highlight the connection between the Declaration and sustainable development; and
• emphasize the need to take diversity of Indigenous peoples into account in implementing the legislation
• a purpose clause to address application of the Declaration in Canadian law and to affirm the legislation as a framework for federal implementation of the Declaration
• clearer and more robust provisions on the process for developing and tabling the action plan and annual reports
• a provision to allow the Governor in Council to designate a Minister to carry out elements of the Act

These changes and additions enhance and build upon the elements set out in PMB C-262.

Q. The BC Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act includes provisions relating to decision-making agreements between the Government of BC and Indigenous Governing Bodies. Similar provisions were not included in C-15. Why not?

A. We recognize the importance of sections 6 and 7 in the BC Declaration, which create space to enter into agreements with a broader range of Indigenous governments. We understand these provisions are intended to allow for increased flexibility for the province to enter into agreements with a broader range of Indigenous governments, including joint or consent-based decision-making agreements.

In the federal context, similar agreement-related provisions already exist in various policies and statutes. Such provisions permit Ministers/the government to negotiate and enter into a variety of agreements and arrangements with Indigenous peoples for particular purposes.

For instance, under the Impact Assessment Act, the responsible Minister has the authority to enter into arrangements or agreements with Indigenous governing bodies (as defined under the Act) for a range of specified purposes related to impact assessment. Further, the Act provides the responsible Minister, at his or her discretion, the ability to substitute an Indigenous governing body process for the Agency's process.

Similarly, the Agency may delegate a part of impact assessment to an Indigenous governing body. Specific agreement-making provisions also exist in other federal legislation such as, the Indigenous Languages Act and An Act Respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis Children, Youth and Families.

In the context of Bill C-15, the inclusion of similar provisions to those in section 6 and 7 in the BC Declaration could pose uncertainty with respect to how the provisions would interact with existing legislative schemes. With that in mind, we remain committed to exploring new, creative ways of working together over time as we develop our action plan and work to ensure federal laws are consistent with the UN Declaration.

Q. Why does the preamble refer to the "Métis Nation" along with First Nations and Inuit as having "… throughout history and to this day, lived in the lands that are now in Canada with their distinct identities, cultures and ways of life"?

A. Over the course of our engagement, we learned from Indigenous peoples across the country that Bill C-262 did not adequately reflect the distinct experiences and realities of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. We therefore needed to find a way to address this concern.

Based on the many proposals we received, and drawing on similar language found in other recent legislation (notably Bills C-91 and C-92), we included a preambular paragraph that recognizes in a positive way the long and distinct histories, identities, cultures and ways of life of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.

Q. What kinds of accountability or recourse mechanisms does the legislation include?

A. In addition to the provisions to align laws with the Declaration, and prepare and implement an action plan, Bill C-15 would require an annual report to be tabled in parliament. The annual report will contribute to accountability for making progress on implementing the Declaration.

Bill C- 15 would require the Government to work with Indigenous peoples to develop an action plan for the ongoing implementation of the Declaration. The action plan would be a vital part of implementing the legislation once it comes into force. This would also provide an opportunity to work together with Indigenous partners on developing specific and concrete measures that would contribute to the implementation of the Declaration, including potential recourse mechanisms.

Q. Why is there no provision relating to the coming into force of the bill?

A. No specific coming into force provision is required if the statute is intended to come into force upon Royal Assent. Section 5 of the Interpretation Act already provides for the coming into force of statutes and specific provisions are only required in order to vary those general provisions.

Q. Would Bill C-15 or implementing the Declaration help with the COVID-19 recovery?

A. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the ongoing health, food security, housing, economic, governance, policing and other vulnerabilities that continue to impact Indigenous communities. Post-COVID economic recovery needs to include Indigenous peoples as full partners in economic recovery and growth.

Bill C-15 could help structure and guide dialogue around combatting the inequality and discrimination against Indigenous peoples that lies at the root of many of these vulnerabilities, as well as around supporting self-determination and the re-building of Indigenous nations and communities and their sustainable development over the longer term.

Q. Would Bill C-15 or implementing the Declaration help address racism?

A. Yes, implementing Bill C-15 can play a significant role in combating racism and discrimination — precisely because it focuses us on taking action and doing the hard work together needed to address these issues on the ground.

Once passed, the legislation would require the Government of Canada to work in consultation and cooperation with Indigenous peoples, to identify what additional measures may be needed to address injustices, combat prejudice and eliminate all forms of violence and discrimination against Indigenous peoples, including elders, youth, children, persons with disabilities, women, men and gender-diverse, and two-spirit persons.

It would also require the plan to include measures to promote mutual respect and understanding as well as good relations, including through human rights education.

While this important national work is taking place, Canada will continue its ongoing discussions with Indigenous peoples to make progress together on our shared priorities for advancing reconciliation, improving community well-being and renewing the nation-to-nation, Inuit-Crown, government-to-government relationship.

If pressed on why C-15 doesn't specifically mention systemic racism:

During engagement, the Government heard from various participants that the legislation should specifically refer to the need to address all forms of discrimination against Indigenous peoples, including systemic discrimination. While racism is undoubtedly related to issues of discrimination, we remain open to hearing through the Parliamentary process about whether this is something that needs to be clarified in order to ensure Bill C-15 is aligned with the objective of contributing to the elimination of racism and prejudice wherever it still exists in our society.

Q. Why was the language for the non-derogation clause, now section 2(2) in Bill C-15 changed from former Bill-262?

A. The non-derogation clause has been adjusted to reflect recent legislative practice and to align with the recommendations made in 2007 by the Senate Committee. Clause 2(2) requires Bill C-15 to be interpreted in a way that upholds section 35 rights. It does not — indeed cannot — be used to diminish Aboriginal or treaty rights protected by section 35 of the Constitution. Further, this clause does not speak to the interpretation of the rights in the Declaration itself, which is governed by international law principles.

Q. Does the Bill repudiate the doctrine of discovery and/or terra nullius?

A. Canada's position is that these ancient doctrines have no place in modern Canadian law and do not inform our ongoing relationship with Indigenous people. The Supreme Court of Canada has clearly indicated that terra nullius never applied in Canada (see Tsilhqot'in, 2014 SCC 44 at para. 69). The preamble to Bill C-15 includes language from the Declaration speaking to "all doctrines, policies and practices" based on racist or discriminatory notions noting that such doctrines are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust. The Government of Canada is also working with Indigenous partners in responding to CTA 46 by developing a Covenant of Reconciliation that specifically addresses the doctrine of discovery.

Q. How many/which federal laws could be impacted by the legislation?

A. Given the scope of the subject areas in the Declaration, many federal laws intersect with elements of the Declaration, including the Indian Act. We anticipate that some existing federal laws will need to be amended in order to better align with the Declaration. This legislation provides a whole-of-government framework for identifying and guiding such future changes. New legislation will also need to be developed with the Declaration in mind.

The full and effective implementation of the Declaration is a process that will take time as the federal government, in cooperation and partnership with Indigenous peoples, assesses changes that need to be made to laws, policies and practices to be consistent with the Declaration. Any future changes to federal law would be undertaken in cooperation with Indigenous peoples and go through regular policy development, engagement and parliamentary processes.

Q. Would the legislation amend the Constitution?

A. No. The legislation does not amend the Constitution — but does recognize that the Declaration should inform how we understand and interpret the Constitution. The Declaration affirms the human rights of Indigenous peoples — both collective and individual rights. These include the inherent right to self-determination and the right of self-government, as well as equality rights, rights relating to culture, spirituality, and identity, and rights relating to lands, territories and resources.

Many of the rights it affirms are already reflected in the Constitution, notably the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and section 35 of the Constitution, which recognizes and affirms Aboriginal and treaty rights. That said, both this legislation and Canadian law recognize that international instruments like the Declaration can be used to interpret the Constitution, which is a "living tree" that evolves over time.

Q. How would the proposed legislation impact provinces and territories? British Columbia already has a Declaration law — how would this interact with their law?

A. The proposed federal legislation on the Declaration will only impose obligations on the federal government. This is a federal bill aimed at aligning federal laws with the Declaration.

The Government of Canada held discussions with provinces and territories and affirmed this position. We are willing to continue bilateral conversations with provinces and territories to clarify the bill's scope.

However, some provincial and territorial governments in Canada are also using the Declaration as a framework for reconciliation and to actively engage with Indigenous peoples on matters that affect them. Nothing in the federal legislation would prevent provinces or territories from developing their own plans and approaches for implementation of the Declaration.

Provincial, territorial and municipal governments each have the ability to establish their own approaches to contributing to the implementation of the Declaration by taking various measures that fall within their areas of authority. The Government of Canada welcomes opportunities to work cooperatively with those governments, Indigenous peoples and other sectors of society towards achieving the objectives of the Declaration.

Q. How does the Government of Canada define Laws of Canada?

A. As used in Bill C-15 the Government of Canada defines the Laws of Canada as federal legislation passed by the Parliament of Canada.

Q. If passed, would the proposed legislation mean that other levels of Government don't need to take action on the Declaration?

A. This legislation is focused on federal action to implement the Declaration. Indigenous rights are human rights and any action that can be taken to affirm, protect and uphold human rights should be encouraged. Implementing the Declaration and recognizing the objectives is the right thing to do.

The Calls to Action by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada specifically highlights actions to support the Declaration that can and should be taken by all levels of government. This journey of reconciliation, building stronger relationships with Indigenous peoples, and building a better Canada is one that we can all do our part. Local, regional, provincial, and organizations alike are encouraged to take action.

Q. Would adopting the Declaration as a framework for reconciliation have an impact on the Canadian economy?

A. Yes, in a positive way. Recognizing and respecting Indigenous rights means that Indigenous peoples are at the table for decisions that impact their rights. In many cases, it means that economic development and stronger economic outcomes will be advanced with Indigenous peoples as partners.

As we work to we will help develop a stronger, more sustainable, and predictable path for everyone to work together as partners, with a shared stake in Canada's future.

We must recognize that participation in economic development is a reflection of self-determination that holds tremendous opportunity to improve the well-being of Indigenous communities. Over time, this participation will help create stronger and healthier communities, and contribute to jobs and economic growth.

Q. What is free, prior and informed consent?

A. References to "free, prior and informed consent" are found throughout the Declaration. They emphasize the importance of recognizing and upholding the rights of Indigenous peoples and ensuring that there is effective and meaningful participation of Indigenous peoples in decisions that affect them, their communities and territories.

Free, prior and informed consent is about working together in partnership and respect. In many ways, it reflects the ideals behind the relationship with Indigenous peoples, by striving to achieve consensus as parties work together in good faith on decisions that impact Indigenous rights and interests. Despite what some have suggested, it is not about having a veto over government decision-making.

It is important to understand free, prior and informed consent in context: different initiatives will have different impacts on Indigenous peoples' rights. Free prior and informed consent may require different processes or new creative ways of working together to ensure meaningful and effective participation in decision-making.

Q. There are a range of views about the provisions relating to FPIC. How do current requirements around "duty to consult" differ from FPIC?

A. As the Principles Respecting the Government of Canada's Relationship with Indigenous Peoples note, FPIC builds on and goes beyond the legal duty to consult. While there are similarities and overlaps between the duty to consult and FPIC, they are not the same thing and they will arise in different ways in different contexts. It is also important to emphasize that existing constitutional and legal obligations will continue.

FPIC focuses on the inclusion of voices, concerns, and opinions of all Indigenous peoples that would be affected by a proposed activity or project, and ensuring that these concerns are addressed and that there are mitigation plans in place.

In terms of the duty to consult, if passed, this legislation would not change Canada's existing duty to consult Indigenous peoples, or other consultation and participation requirements set out in other legislation like the new Impact Assessment Act. What it would do is inform how the Government approaches the implementation of its legal duties going forward. Additionally, it would do so in a way that provides greater clarity and creates greater certainty over time for Indigenous partners and all Canadians. The Government of Canada has a constitutional duty to consult and accommodate Indigenous partners when it considers measures that might adversely impact potential or established Aboriginal or treaty rights. This has been consistently confirmed by the Courts. The Government has consistently worked to uphold this duty and has shown its commitment to taking additional steps to do so.

Q. What happens if there is a disagreement, consensus is not reached or consent is withheld? Does free, prior and informed consent mean a veto?

A. In the event consent is withheld, the facts and law applicable to the specific circumstances will determine the path forward. Decision-making on the part of the Government of Canada would need to proceed on the basis of the relevant legal framework, including any negotiated or other arrangements.

Both section 35 of Canada's Constitution and the Declaration recognize that there are certain circumstances where the Government may be justified in proceeding with a decision that impacts Indigenous rights, provided meaningful engagement has occurred and efforts have been made to minimize those impacts. In many cases, government decisions are judicially reviewable, meaning Indigenous partners can ask a court to review the decision if they have concerns about the decision or how it was taken.

Legislation that supports the implementation of the Declaration would continue to encourage us to find new, creative ways of working together and integrating diverse perspectives into decision-making that help build deeper collaboration and consensus, while also continuing to respect the Canadian Constitution, notably section 35.

Q. How would this impact natural resource projects? Would it affect existing projects or future projects?

A. If Bill C-15 is passed and receives Royal Assent, it would not change existing laws, including statutory provisions related to Indigenous consultation, or procedural requirements set out in legislation like the Impact Assessment Act.

Government and proponents will continue to be required to meet all existing legal obligations and requirements.

With regard to natural resource projects, the Declaration would not create any new or specific legal obligations. However, the Declaration would underscore that securing consent for a project may require different processes or new creative ways of working together to ensure meaningful and effective participation in decision-making.

Q. Would the federal government maintain the final authority for making decisions on infrastructure and resource projects once this legislation is enacted into law?

A. Decision-making with respect to infrastructure or resource projects will continue to be governed by the relevant legal and policy regimes. The proposed legislation and any implementation measures identified as part of the development of the action plan would apply only to federal areas of jurisdiction. The Government will continue to support and advance processes of resolution over lands to reconcile the relationships with Indigenous peoples based on the recognition of rights, respect, cooperation and partnership.

We recognize that the majority of natural resource development projects occur on provincial Crown and private lands, and that there are multiple jurisdictions and shared responsibilities. This is why the federal government will continue to engage with provinces and territories as the proposed legislation advances, and will encourage ways to work collaboratively to implement the Declaration in Canada.

The Declaration would not create any new or specific legal obligations with respect to decision-making. Rather, it would underscore that securing consent for a project may require different processes or new creative ways of working together to ensure meaningful and effective participation in decision-making.

Q. Does the importance of securing free, prior and informed consent increase on Aboriginal title lands?

A. Yes. The Supreme Court of Canada has indicated that the standard for securing consent of Indigenous peoples is strongest on Aboriginal title lands.

Aboriginal title, as affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada, provides the right to use, control, and manage the land and the right to the economic benefits of the land and its resources. This right is recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

It is up to the Indigenous peoples who have Aboriginal title to decide how to use and manage their lands. However, this is subject to the limit that the land cannot be developed in a way that would deprive future generations of the benefit of the land. Like other section 35 rights, title rights are not absolute and can be infringed upon if the high threshold of justification, which includes Indigenous perspectives and satisfies the Crown's fiduciary obligations, is met.

Q. According to the Declaration, free, prior and informed consent extends beyond lands and resources (e.g. Article 19 on legislative or administrative measures). How will consent work in those situations?

A. The Government of Canada will look for opportunities to build processes and approaches aimed at securing consent, as well as creative and innovative mechanisms that will help build deeper collaboration, consensus, and new ways of working together. It will ensure that Indigenous peoples and their governments have a role in public decision making consistent with Canada's constitutional framework and that Indigenous rights, and interests, are recognized and taken into account in decision-making that affects them.

Q. Industry has asked that federal legislation clarify or include a definition of free, prior and informed consent. Will you do that?

A. Like other human rights protections set out in international human rights instruments and the Constitution, free, prior and informed consent is a fundamental safeguard that must be understood in context. This makes it challenging to define in legislation. That said, the debate and discussion of this proposed legislation, as well as the processes to be established by it, will allow for discussions on a variety of elements in the Declaration, including the concept of free, prior and informed consent. This will help to build greater shared understanding of the Declaration and how it can best be implemented in Canada. The development of an action plan would be a venue to advance discussions on this point.

Q. How will adopting the Declaration as a framework to advance reconciliation improve the Government's relationships with Indigenous peoples?

A. The Declaration provides human rights-based principles, norms and standards for reconciliation to flourish in 21st century Canada and beyond. There will be many benefits as we work together to identify new measures to reflect the rights and objectives in the Declaration. Through this process, we will:

• Continue to renew and strengthen the nation-to-nation, Inuit-Crown, and government-to-government relationships, including through respect for the collective and individual rights of Indigenous peoples
• Build on the momentum for supporting Indigenous peoples in exercising their right to self-determination, including through the conclusion of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements
• Support Indigenous peoples as they work to restore and strengthen their governance systems and reconstitute their nations
• Collectively address the impacts of colonization and systemic racism and discrimination
• Respond to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, which both called on the governments of all levels to adopt the Declaration as a framework for reconciliation
• Create a framework that will help increase clarity and predictability in the long term with respect to the rights of Indigenous peoples and their implementation

Many Indigenous leaders, peoples and partners supported former Private Member's Bill C-262 with enhancements and voiced support on moving forward with the federal government's plan to implement the Declaration. Bill C-15 demonstrates a true commitment to advance reconciliation and improve relationships with Indigenous peoples.

Q. Assuming Bill C-15 receives royal assent this spring, what are your short-term goals for Indigenous reconciliation? Are there any particular UNDRIP-related issues that the government would like to address on a "priority basis" with Indigenous Peoples?

A. Priorities and short-term goals to support reconciliation will need to be identified in collaboration and cooperation with Indigenous peoples. The development of an action plan will be a key piece of this.

As we take on this new work, the Government will continue its efforts on other priorities that support reconciliation and which intersect with the implementation of the Declaration. This includes:

• Continued work to implement Indigenous languages and child and family services legislation (Bills C-91 and C-92);
• Responding to the recommendations of the Final Report on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, and the completion of the national action plan;
• Development of Indigenous health and policing legislation;
• Ongoing efforts to address safe drinking water on reserve; and
• Continued negotiations through Recognition of Indigenous Rights and Self-Determination (RIRSD) tables to move us beyond the Indian Act.

Biographical information

Mr. Anandasangaree was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015, and again in 2019.

Prior to his election to the House of Commons, Mr. Anandasangaree advocated for education and justice as an internationally recognized human rights lawyer and community activist. He has served as Chair of the Canadian Tamil Youth Development Centre, President of the Canadian Tamils' Chamber of Commerce, and counsel to the Canadian Tamil Congress. He was also legal counsel to the Independent Mortgage Brokers and Agents, a board member of the Youth Challenge Fund, member of the Toronto Police Chief's Advisory Board, and a member of the United Way Newcomers Grant Program.

Mr. Anandasangaree attended Osgoode Hall Law School. He was called to the bar in 2006 and later managed his own firm in Scarborough, Ontario. He has been an advocate for human rights issues, regularly representing Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada at the United Nations. He has also served as an advocate for local youth, intervening in cases of wrongful student expulsion and suspension.

For his community service and local advocacy, Mr. Anandasangaree has received both the Queen's Golden and Diamond Jubilee medals. He also received the Osgoode Hall Law School "One to Watch" Gold Key Award and the South Asian Bar Association's Young Practitioner Award.

Biographical information

Born in Potlotek First Nation, NS, Mr. Battiste was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Battiste was a published writer on Mi'kmaq laws, history, and knowledge. After graduating from Dalhousie Law in 2004, he worked as a professor, senior advisor, citizenship coordinator and Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief.

Mr. Battiste has extensive volunteer experience in athletics, youth advocacy, community events, and advocacy for the Mi'kmaw Nation. He is a member of the Aboriginal Sport Circle and a part owner of the Eskasoni Junior B Eagles. He served as the Nova Scotia Youth council representative to the Assembly of First Nation National Youth Council from 2001-2006. In 2005, the National Aboriginal Healing Organization named him as one of the National Aboriginal Role Models in Canada. In 2006, as Chair of the Assembly of First Nations Youth Council, he became one of the founding members of the Mi'kmaq Maliseet Atlantic Youth Council (MMAYC), an organization that represents and advocates for Mi'kmaw and Maliseet youth within the Atlantic. In 2018, Mr. Battiste was recognized with the Sovereign's Medal for Volunteers.

Mr. Battiste is the first Mi'kmaw Member of Parliament.

Biographical information

Born in Hamilton, ON, Mr. Bratina was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015, and again in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Bratina worked in radio and broadcasting for local morning shows and sporting events. In 1998, he was inducted into the Football Reporters of Canada Hall of Fame. He was also a nominee for Hamilton Citizen of the Year, and won Hamilton Mountain Citizen of the Year. He also served on numerous Boards of Directors including; GO Transit, Art Gallery of Hamilton, Theatre Aquarius, and HECFI.

In 2004, he was elected as MPP for Hamilton Centre, and again in 2006. His concerns over high lead readings in city drinking water resulted in a lead water service replacement loan program and a lead blood screening program for young children. He was elected as Mayor of Hamilton in 2010, seeing the completion of a new stadium, development in the downtown core, and a move to solve the impasse in the local Randle Reed project.

Biographical information

Born in Fort William, ON, Mr. Powlowski was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Powlowski served as a physician in the Emergency Room at Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre. In addition to being a medical doctor, he has two law degrees - LL.B, LL.M from the universities of Toronto and Georgetown, respectively. He also attended Harvard University and obtained a Masters of Public Health in Health Law and Policy.

Mr. Powlowski worked as a doctor for two years in northern First Nations communities, and for seven years practicing medicine in several developing countries in Africa and Oceania. For several years, he worked as a consultant in health legislation for the World Health Organization. He also volunteered on a medical project in Ethiopia.

Biographical information

Born in Toronto, ON, Mr. van Koeverden was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. van Koeverden was a professional sprint kayaker. He has won numerous Olympic medals, including the gold medal in men's canoeing at the 2004 Athens Olympic Games, and has also won numerous medals at World Championship events, including the gold medal in 2007, and again in 2011.

Mr. van Koeverden has also worked as a managing consultant with Deloitte, and as a broadcaster, writer and producer with CBC Sports. He graduated as valedictorian from McMaster University in 2007 with a Bachelor of Science in Kinesiology.

He has volunteered extensively for organizations like Right To Play, WaterAID, Special Olympics, Parkinson's Canada, and the David Suzuki Foundation. He has also served as Chair of the Canadian Olympic Athletes' Commission, and was a member of the federal government's working group for Gender Inclusion and Gender Based Violence in Sport.

Biographical information

Born in Sydney, Australia, Ms. Zann was first elected to House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to her election, Ms. Zann worked as a screen, television, stage, and voice actress, and appeared in numerous television shows, films, radio, and animated series.

Ms. Zann was elected to the Nova Scotia House of Assembly in 2009, and again in 2013 for the Nova Scotia NDP. She was the NDP spokesperson for Education, Environment, Status of Women, Human Rights Commission, Aboriginal Affairs & Truth & Reconciliation, Agriculture, Advanced Education, African NS Affairs, and Gaelic Affairs. She served as the Ministerial Assistant for the Department of Tourism, Culture, and Heritage.

Ms. Zann also produces and directs a community theatre production for the Truro Theatre Society.

Biographical information

Born in Kenora, Ontario, Mr. Melillo was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Melillo studied economics at Lakehead University, worked for a non-partisan think tank in Thunder Bay (Northern Policy Institute) conducting policy analysis, served as an Associate for a Business Consulting firm, and worked as the campaign manager for Kenora—Rainy River MPP Greg Rickford.

Mr. Melillo is the Conservative Party's Shadow Minister for Northern Affairs and Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario.

Mr. Melillo is the first Generation Z MP, the youngest Conservative MP ever elected in Canada, and the youngest in the 43rd Canadian Parliament.

Biographical information

Born in Meadow Lake, SK, Mr. Vidal was elected to the House of Commons for the first time in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Vidal served as Mayor of Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan from 2011 to 2019. He graduated from Carpenter High School in 1983 and went on to study at the University of Saskatchewan and Briercrest Bible College. He is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CGA) and is a partner in the accounting firm Pliska Vidal & Co. where he has been serving clients since 1988. He was also Vice Chair of Saskatchewan City Mayors' Caucus from 2016 to 2018. He was a member of the SaskWater Board of Directors from 2008 to 2017. In this position, he also served as Chair of the Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee, and Chair of the Board from 2015 to 2017.

Mr. Vidal is currently the CPC critic for Indigenous Services.

Mr. Vidal has volunteered in a variety of leadership capacities in his local church as well as coaching and managing minor hockey, baseball, and soccer teams. In 2012, he was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal.

Biographical information

Born in Barrhead, AB, Mr. Viersen was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015, and again in 2019.

Prior to his election, Mr. Viersen apprenticed as an auto service technician and attained his journeyman ticket from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT). He has also earned a business degree from the University of the Fraser Valley (UFV) while continuing his automotive career.

In the 42nd Parliament, Mr. Viersen was the CPC Deputy Critic of Rural Affairs. Since 2015, he has been a member of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs.

Mr. Viersen is involved in a number of parliamentary caucuses; including the Indigenous Affairs Caucus, Outdoor Caucus, and the Pro-Life Caucus. He is also a member of the Canada-Netherlands Parliamentary Friendship Group, Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament and the Parliamentary Friends of the Kurds.

Biographical information

Born in Brampton, ON, Mr. Schmale was elected to the House of Commons for the first time in 2015, and again in 2019.

Prior to his election to, Mr. Schmale he served as the executive assistant and campaign manager for former Conservative MP Barry Devolin (Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock, Ontario). He graduated from the Radio Broadcasting program at Loyalist College in Ontario, and started his career as a news anchor. He later became news director for CHUM media.

Mr. Schmale served as critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations under Andrew Scheer's leadership. Following the election of Erin O'Toole as CPC leader, he was appointed critic for Families, Children, and Social Development. On February 10, 2021, during a CPC critic shuffle, he was re-appointed critic for Crown-Indigenous Relations.

During his time as critic for Families, Children, and Social Development (2020), he was a member of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities (HUMA).

In the 42nd Parliament, Mr. Schmale served as the opposition critic for Northern Economic Development, and Deputy Critic for Natural Resources. He was a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs (2015-2017) and the Standing Committee on Natural Resources (2017-2019).

Biographical information

Ms. Bérubé was first elected to the House of Commons in 2019.

Prior to her election, Ms. Bérubé she spent 30 years with the CISSS de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue in human resources and information. She also acted as the Director of the social committee at l'Hôpital de Val-d'Or, administrator for Taxibus, was a member of the information security association of Québec, and was President of the Parti Québécois d'Abitibi-Est.

Ms. Bérubé is currently the critic for Indigenous Affairs.

Biographical information

Ms. Blaney was first elected to the House of Commons in 2015 and again in 2019.

Prior to her election, Ms. Blaney was a non-profit professional. She was the Executive Director of the Immigrant Welcome Centre of North Vancouver Island.

Ms. Blaney is currently the Whip for the NDP and Spokesperson on Veteran's Issues.

She previously sat on INAN and was a Vice-Chair during the 42nd Parliament from May 28, 2018 until Parliament was dissolved.