Value for Money Audit: Giant Mine Remediation Plan - Follow-up Report Status Update as of December 31, 2014
PDF Version (41 Kb, 7 Pages)
Action Plan Implementation Status Update Report to the Audit Committee - As of December 31, 2014
Northern Affairs Organization
Project Recommendations | Action Plan | Expected Completion Date |
Program Response |
---|---|---|---|
1. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Northern Affairs Organization, should ensure that the proposed governance framework for the Giant Mine Remediation Project is finalized and implemented, with minutes and records of decision documented for the key governing bodies, such as the Oversight Committee and the Senior Project Advisory Committee. | The GMRP team accepts this recommendation. The proposed GMRP governance framework will be finalized, approved by the Project Leader, and fully implemented to operational status. This applies to all current governing bodies included in the proposed governance framework, specifically Senior Project Advisory Committee, Management Board, and Project Leadership Committee. Operational status for each body will include formalized and approved Terms of Reference, agenda, minutes and records of decisions (where not already on-going). | September 27, 2012 | Status: Update/Rationale: Completed – September 27, 2012 The proposed Giant Mine Remediation Project (GMRP) governance framework has been finalized, approved by the Project Leader, and fully implemented to operational status. This applies to all current governing bodies included in the proposed governance framework, specifically Senior Project Advisory Committee, Management Board, and Project Leadership Committee. Operational status for each of these bodies includes approved Terms of Reference, meeting agendas, minutes and records of decisions. AES: Implemented. The recommendation will be closed. Closed. |
2. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Northern Affairs Organization, should ensure that a comprehensive risk management framework (including strategic and project level risks) and a risk management plan are established for the Giant Mine Remediation Project to monitor risks on a regular basis. | The Giant Mine Remediation Project Team will expand the scope of the risk assessment process to include technical and strategic risks and incorporate a risk management plan. This more robust risk management approach will initially focus on the current life cycle phase (PPA Phase or Phase 2b/2c – Preliminary/Detail Design) and evolve to include the total project scope before the Effective Project Approval is sought from the Treasury Board. The Risk Management Plan will be included in the Project Execution Plan (PEP) for the project. | PPA Phase Project Execution Plan: March 31, 2013 Overall GMRP Project Execution Plan: December 31, 2014 |
Status: Request to close (completed) Update/Rationale: The GMRP finalized the Project Execution Plan in October 2013, including a Risk Management Plan and supporting Risk Register, which is reviewed and updated annually. AES: Implemented. The recommendation will be closed. Closed. |
3. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Northern Affairs Organization, should ensure, as part of the Major Project Office implementation, that:
|
The GMRP team accepts this recommendation. As part of the Major Project Office implementation, the following specific actions will be taken:
|
November 15, 2012 | Status: Request to close (completed) Update/Rationale: Completed - November 19, 2012 Completed -Workshop conducted with key AANDC HQ, Region, PWGSC and GNWT members to compile single GMRP org chart (January 2013); Roles and Responsibilities developed from single GMRP org chart (March 2013); Org chart and RASCI have been incorporated into PEP (November 2013) |
|
March 31, 2013 |
Completed - Feedback on MPO incorporated from key chapter reviewers (December 2012); MPO Draft circulated for final review (January 2013); MPO Draft updated with comments and signed by Director, CSP; MPO Standards and Guidance Manual endorsed March 31, 2013. (Note: Project Leader, ADM of NAO, approved on January 7, 2014) | |
|
March 31, 2013 | Completed (March 2014) – Training Modules have been developed and are presently being rolled out to the GMRP Team. This web based, self paced training has been included in all GMRP Team's Learning Plans for 2014-2015. This training is designed to provide a thorough understanding of: project management requirements; roles and responsibilities; and linkages among the various project planning and management documents related to the project. | |
|
March 31, 2013 | Completed - Baseline schedule for Definition Phase (five-year period) revised with four-year project plans (September 2012); Master schedule for total project (2025) developed, approved and included in the PEP (November 2013); Schedule Management Plan (PEP) has been completed (November 2013) |
|
|
October 31, 2013 | Completed – GMRP Change Control process developed and approved (March 2013); Change Control process incorporated into PEP Chapter 4 (November 2013) AES: Implemented. The recommendation will be closed. Closed. | |
4. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Northern Affairs Organization, should ensure, through consultation with the Chief Financial Officer, that budget management and cost estimation practices for the Giant Mine Remediation Project are strengthened by:
|
The GMRP team accepts this recommendation. The following actions will be implemented in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer:
|
December 31, 2014 |
Status: Underway Update/Rationale: A Cost Management Plan has been developed for the GMRP as part of the Project Execution Plan in October 2013, however the Master Project Budget (Total Estimated Cost to Complete) will require updating following the Final Decision on Environmental Assessment of August 2014. This work is currently underway and is expected to be complete by 31/03/2016. Monte Carlo and other simulations would allow the Giant Mine remediation project team to run many "what-if" scenarios to arrive at a probability-weighted distribution to support the estimation of the life cycle cost of the project. As a result, the project team agrees that a Monte Carlo (or similar) simulation should be performed in the future to support the development of future life cycle cost estimates of the Giant Mine remediation project. This simulation has not been done, and is not proposed to be done within the current phase, due to its anticipated limited value currently, given the preliminary stage of the project and the large number of cost variables with large levels of uncertainty. Performing a Monte Carlo simulation with the large number of variables, each with large levels of uncertainty, would result in a life cycle cost point estimate with such large potential variances from the point estimate that the resulting cost estimate would have limited usefulness. As a result, the project team will implement this recommendation at a later phase in the project, when the variables and their sensitivity ranges become more limited to increase the value of the simulation result. AES: Recommend to close. Closed. |
|
March 31, 2013 (PPA Phase) | ||
5. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Northern Affairs Organization, should ensure, through consultation with the Chief Financial Officer, that the current approach to procurement management for the Giant Mine Remediation Project is strengthened by:
|
The GMRP team accepts this recommendation. The following actions will be implemented in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer:
|
March 31, 2013 | Status: Request to close (Completed) Update/Rationale: Completed - March 2013 Procurement Management Plan integrated into the Giant PMS and reporting/dashboard process (March 2013) ; An Integrated Procurement Management Plan (AANDC & PWGSC) has been developed and forms part of the Project Execution Plan (November 2013) AES: Implemented. The recommendation will be closed. Closed. |
Materiel and Assets Management Division will implement a process where the monitoring of the file will be done quarterly. As of September 4th, all call-ups will be done by MAMD, therefore the Procurement Officers will be able to monitor all expenditure on the files. | September 4, 2012 | ||
The Procurement Officer will also request adequate justification for all amendments and make sure that the checklist is completed and reviewed. | September 4, 2012 |