Archived - Summative Evaluation of the First Nations Oil and Gas and Moneys Management Act Implementation - Follow-up Report Status Update as of March 31, 2011
Archived information
This Web page has been archived on the Web. Archived information is provided for reference, research or record keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
PDF Version (28 Kb, 3 Pages)
Action Plan Implementation Status Update Report to the Evaluation, Performance Measurement and Review Committee - As of March 31, 2011
Lands and Economic Development and Resolution and Individual Affairs
Summative Evaluation of the Implementation of the First Nation Oil and Gas and Moneys Management Act (2009087)
Approval Date: 05/14/2010
| Project Recommendations | Action Plan | Expected Completion Date | Program Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Based on the evaluation findings, INAC (specifically IOGC) should determine the feasibility of continuing with the implementation of the oil and gas management portion of FNOGMMA. | Lands and Economic Development (LED)/IOGC will prepare materials to engage in a Senior Policy discussion on the options and feasibility of continuing with the implementation of the oil and gas management portion of FNOGMMA. | Presentation to the Senior Policy Committee June 22, 2010 |
Status: Close
Update/Rationale: Presented material and engaged in discussions with Senior Policy Committee on June 22, 2010. Their recommendation was to summarize material and continue the discussion with the Minister which is anticipated in October - November. AES: Recommend closure but further decisions pending and reflected in the following recommendations. |
| 2. Before further implementation of the oil and gas management portion of FNOGMMA and to inform future implementation of the moneys portion of FNOGMMA, INAC should build on the evaluation findings and address the following targeted issues: | Confirm with oil and gas provinces by June 15, 2010 |
Status: On Hold
Update/Rationale: |
|
| a) The needs of provinces for their participation in the implementation of FNOGMMA (specifically IOGC). | a. IOGC will engage the oil and gas producing provinces to confirm procedural or legislative changes required to facilitate the continued implementation of the oil and gas component of FNOGMMA | Active outreach and promoting to oil and gas First Nations that may be interested over summer of 2010. | 2a- Discussion with Province of Alberta on hold pending decision to open up FNOGMMA |
| b) Improve its understanding of First Nation priorities and interests with respect to oil and gas management on reserves, the risk and benefits to First Nations opting into the FNOGMMA, and the relationship between FNOGMMA and the modernization of the Indian Oil and Gas Act as well as potential litigation as an alternative to FNOGMMA (specifically IOGC). |
b. IOGC will conduct outreach to interested First Nations as well as actively promote the availability of the oil and gas management component to other First Nations that may be interested to gauge interest and potential uptake as well as to identify both benefits and potential issues that First Nations may foresee. Key to this outreach:
|
March 31, 2011 | 2b-Since the ultimate decision as to the future direction has not yet been made, we did not conduct an outreach to oil and gas producing First Nations to determine level of interest. However, we have received two unsolicited BCR's from Onion lake First Nation and Beaver Lake Cree Nation requesting entrance into the oil and gas component of FNOGMMA. |
| c) Take into consideration the lessons learned and best practices (particularly related to readiness, capacity development, and governance) of other optional legislation, including the First Nation Land Management Act, the First Nation Commercial and Industrial Development Act, and the First Nation Fiscal and Statistical Management Act (Individual Affairs Branch (IAB) and IOGC). | c. IOGC and Indian Moneys, Estates and Treaty Annuities (IMETA) will conduct an analysis of the other optional legislative programs to learn and understand if there are related 'lessons learned' or 'best practices', which can be used and transferred to the delivery of the moneys management and or the oil and gas management portions of FNOGMMA. |
2c-Some informal discussions have been held regarding lessons learned and possible legislative amendment required, but still awaiting the ministerial decision regarding the future direction of the oil and gas portion of FNOGMMA
AES: No comment |
|
| 3. INAC (IAB and IOGC, if applicable) should develop a process for assessing the specific capacity needs of individual First Nations as well as risk factors that could affect their completion of the FNOGMMA process. This process should also include a method to develop mitigation strategies related to the identified capacity needs and potential success factors of individual First Nations |
IOGC has developed a document entitled 'Governance and Operational Guideline for Developing a Business Plan' as part of the Oil and Gas Implementation Policy. Additionally, IMETA (IAB) developed a document entitled "FNOGMMA Moneys Management Implementation Policy" which contains a process and criteria for assessing financial management capacity of a First Nation.
IOGC and IMETA will review and update their respective Implementation Policies as needed to include the specific capacity needs of First Nations and address the risk and success factors that could affect individual First Nation completion of the FNOGMMA process; and a method to develop viable mitigation strategies. |
Preliminary Review for input into an Memorandum to Cabinet completed by June 30, 2010
Detailed Review completed by |
Status: On Hold
Update/Rationale: On hold pending decision to open up FNOGMMA AES: No comment |
| 4. INAC (Individual Affairs Branch and IOGC if applicable) should incorporate FNOGMMA's long-term outcomes (particularly related to the broader economic, governance and capacity outcomes) and more details on program activities and outputs into a performance measurement strategy, which should then be implemented to track the performance of the program. Only if the objectives of the moneys and the oil and gas portions of FNOGMMA are dramatically different, should INAC consider separate authorities for the two components. | IOGC and IMETA will develop a Performance Measurement Framework for FNOGMMA. This will include a logic model and performance measurement indicators for the desired outcomes and outputs, taking into account any program changes resulting from the previous recommendations. | Completed and integrated into TB Submission by January 31, 2011 |
Status: On Hold
Update/Rationale: On hold pending decision to open up FNOGMMA AES: No comment |